Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparisons to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach

被引:236
作者
Welsh, MP
Poe, GL
机构
[1] Hagler Bailly Consulting Inc, Stratus Consulting Inc, Madison, WI 53711 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Agr Resource & Managerial Econ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jeem.1998.1043
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper develops a multiple bounded discrete choice elicitation technique that allows respondents to express their level of voting certainty for a wide range of referendum thresholds. The paper concludes with the results of an empirical study comparing values obtained from a multiple bounded model with values derived from three standard contingent valuation elicitation formats: dichotomous choice, payment card, and open-ended. The multiple bounded discrete choice format covers the range of values associated with the other three predominantly used elicitation methods. Moreover, alternative parameterizations of the multiple bounded discrete choice model correspond to these standard elicitation techniques. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 185
页数:16
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ALBERINI A, 1997, W 133 BENEFIT COST T
[2]  
Arrow K., 1993, FED REGISTER, V58, P4602
[3]   Valuing public goods: Discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses [J].
Boyle, KJ ;
Johnson, FR ;
McCollum, DW ;
Desvousges, WH ;
Dunford, RW ;
Hudson, SP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (03) :381-396
[4]   Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good? [J].
Brown, TC ;
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
McCollum, DW .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1996, 72 (02) :152-166
[5]   OLS VERSUS ML ESTIMATION OF NON-MARKET RESOURCE VALUES WITH PAYMENT CARD INTERVAL DATA [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
HUPPERT, DD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1989, 17 (03) :230-246
[6]   ESTIMATION USING CONTINGENT VALUATION DATA FROM A DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE WITH FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
QUIGGIN, J .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 27 (03) :218-234
[7]  
CAMERON TA, 1998, ASSA M CHIC
[8]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162
[9]  
Cummings R.G., 1986, VALUING ENV GOODS AS
[10]  
Desvousges W.H., 1992, RES TRIANGLE I MONOG, V92-1