Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates
被引:82
作者:
Ramani, R
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
Ramani, R
Gromadzki, S
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
Gromadzki, S
Pincus, DH
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
Pincus, DH
Salkin, IF
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
Salkin, IF
Chaturvedi, V
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USANew York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
Chaturvedi, V
[1
]
机构:
[1] New York State Dept Hlth, Wadsworth Ctr, David Axelrod Inst Publ Hlth, Labs Mycol, Albany, NY 12208 USA
The abilities of the API 20C and ID 32C yeast identification systems to identify 123 common and 120 rare clinical yeast isolates were compared. API 20C facilitated correct identification of 97% common and 88% rare isolates while ID 32C facilitated correct identification of 92% common and 85% rare isolates.