INVESTMENT IN ANTIVIRAL DRUGS: A REAL OPTIONS APPROACH

被引:18
作者
Attema, Arthur E. [1 ,2 ]
Lugner, Anna K. [3 ]
Feenstra, Talitha L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Prevent & Hlth Serv Res, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, iBMG iMTA, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Infect Dis Control Netherlands, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
antiviral drugs; decision under uncertainty; real options analysis; PROSPECT-THEORY; PANDEMIC INFLUENZA; DECISION-MAKING; UTILITY; ECONOMICS; COSTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/hec.1549
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Real options analysis is a promising approach to model investment under uncertainty. We employ this approach to value stockpiling of antiviral drugs as a precautionary measure against a possible influenza pandemic. Modifications of the real options approach to include risk attitude and deviations from expected utility are presented. We show that risk aversion counteracts the tendency to delay investment for this case of precautionary investment, which is in contrast to earlier applications of risk aversion to real options analysis. Moreover, we provide a numerical example using real world data and discuss the implications of real options analysis for health policy. Suggestions for further extensions of the model and a comparison with the expected value of information analysis are put forward. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1240 / 1254
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]  
Balicer RD, 2005, EMERG INFECT DIS, V11, P1280
[3]  
Bertsekas D. P., 1976, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
[4]   PARTIALLY WRONG? PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM AND THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN [J].
Beutels, P. ;
Edmunds, W. J. ;
Smith, R. D. .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 17 (11) :1317-1322
[5]   Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL ;
Wakker, PP .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (11) :1498-1514
[6]   Real options and product life cycles [J].
Bollen, NPB .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (05) :670-684
[7]  
Briggs AH., 1999, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V3, P1, DOI [10.3310/hta3020, DOI 10.3310/HTA3020]
[8]  
Casparie A F, 1998, Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, V142, P2075
[9]  
*CBS, 2008, HARM CONS PRIC IND
[10]   The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies [J].
Claxton, K .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1999, 18 (03) :341-364