Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties

被引:520
作者
Collins, N. J. [1 ,2 ]
Prinsen, C. A. C. [3 ]
Christensen, R. [4 ]
Bartels, E. M. [5 ]
Terwee, C. B. [3 ]
Roos, E. M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Parker Inst, Musculoskeletal Stat Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hosp, Parker Inst, Biochem & Physiol Lab, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, Res Unit Musculoskeletal Funct & Physiotherapy, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Knee injury; Knee osteoarthritis; KOOS; Patient-reported outcome measures; Measurement properties; Meta-analysis; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; PHYSICAL-FUNCTION; RASCH ANALYSIS; VERSION; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; RESPONSIVENESS; VALIDITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize evidence regarding measurement properties of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Design: A comprehensive literature search identified 37 eligible papers evaluating KOOS measurement properties in participants with knee injuries and/or osteoarthritis (OA). Methodological quality was evaluated using the COSMIN checklist. Where possible, meta-analysis of extracted data was conducted for all studies and stratified by age and knee condition; otherwise narrative synthesis was performed. Results: KOOS has adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity in young and old adults with knee injuries and/or OA. The ADL subscale has better content validity for older patients and Sport/Rec for younger patients with knee injuries, while the Pain subscale is more relevant for painful knee conditions. The five-factor structure of the original KOOS is unclear. There is some evidence that the KOOS subscales demonstrate sufficient unidimensionality, but this requires confirmation. Although measurement error requires further evaluation, the minimal detectable change for KOOS subscales ranges from 14.3 to 19.6 for younger individuals, and >= 20 for older individuals. Evidence of responsiveness comes from larger effect sizes following surgical (especially total knee replacement) than non-surgical interventions. Conclusions: KOOS demonstrates adequate content validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness for age-and condition-relevant subscales. Structural validity, cross-cultural validity and measurement error require further evaluation, as well as construct validity of KOOS Physical function Short form. Suggested order of subscales for different knee conditions can be applied in hierarchical testing of endpoints in clinical trials. (C) 2016 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1317 / 1329
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, internal consistency and validation of the Arabic version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for Egyptian people with knee injuries [J].
Almangoush, A. ;
Herrington, L. ;
Attia, I. ;
Jones, R. ;
Aldawoudy, A. ;
Aziz, A. Abdul ;
Waley, A. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2013, 21 (12) :1855-1864
[2]
[Anonymous], 1994, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY
[3]
Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions [J].
Bekkers, J. E. J. ;
de Windt, Th. S. ;
Raijmakers, N. J. H. ;
Dhert, W. J. A. ;
Saris, D. B. F. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2009, 17 (11) :1434-1439
[4]
Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 [J].
Boers, Maarten ;
Kirwan, John R. ;
Wells, George ;
Beaton, Dorcas ;
Gossec, Laure ;
d'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta ;
Conaghan, Philip G. ;
Bingham, Clifton O., III ;
Brooks, Peter ;
Landewe, Robert ;
March, Lyn ;
Simon, Lee S. ;
Singh, Jasvinder A. ;
Strand, Vibeke ;
Tugwell, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (07) :745-753
[5]
Responsiveness of the OARSI-OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and function measures [J].
Bond, M. ;
Davis, A. ;
Lohmander, S. ;
Hawker, G. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 (06) :541-547
[6]
Briem K, 2012, LAEKNABLADID, V98, P403, DOI 10.17992/lbl.2012.0708.444
[7]
Chaipinyo K., 2009, Thai Journal of Physical Therapy, V31, P67
[8]
Is Rasch model analysis applicable in small sample size pilot studies for assessing item characteristics? An example using PROMIS pain behavior item bank data [J].
Chen, Wen-Hung ;
Lenderking, William ;
Jin, Ying ;
Wyrwich, Kathleen W. ;
Gelhorn, Heather ;
Revicki, Dennis A. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (02) :485-493
[9]
Patient-Reported Outcomes for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Commonly Used Instruments and Attributes of a "Good" Measure [J].
Collins, Natalie J. ;
Roos, Ewa M. .
CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2012, 28 (03) :367-+
[10]
Measures of Knee Function International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS) [J].
Collins, Natalie J. ;
Misra, Devyani ;
Felson, David T. ;
Crossley, Kay M. ;
Roos, Ewa M. .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2011, 63 :S208-S228