Work domain analysis for air traffic controller weather displays

被引:66
作者
Ahlstrom, U [1 ]
机构
[1] FAA, William J Hughes Tech Ctr, NAS Human Factors Grp, Atlantic City, NJ 08405 USA
关键词
cognitive work analysis; terminal air traffic control; information requirements; display design; simulation capability;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.001
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Adverse weather conditions have a major impact on National Airspace System (NAS) operations. They create safety hazards for pilots, constrain the usable airspace for air traffic control (ATC), and reduce the overall capacity of the NAS. A system-wide dissemination of weather information to controllers could theoretically improve safety and efficiency. Problem: However, it is currently unclear what weather information would be beneficial for tactical operations. Furthermore, no previous research has empirically evaluated optimal presentation designs for ATC weather displays. III-designed weather displays can cause safety hazards by presenting redundant information (i.e., by increasing the cognitive load) and display clutter (e.g., by interfering with the visual extraction of traffic data). Method: In the present paper, we outline our use of cognitive work analysis (CWA) techniques for the assessment of weather information needs for terminal controllers. Results: Specifically, we describe how the CWA modeling tools helped us reveal instances in the terminal domain where weather information is lacking or insufficiently disseminated. We used our CWA results to drive the development of weather display concepts and to set up a high-fidelity simulation capability. Impact on Industry: By means of high-fidelity simulations, we can empirically evaluate controller weather information needs in order to propose weather displays for increased aircraft safety and efficiency of terminal operations. © 2005 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 169
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
AHLSTROM U, 2004, J AIR TRAFFIC CONTRO, V46, P7
[2]  
Ahlstrom U., 2003, J AIR TRAFFIC CONTRO, V45, P14
[3]  
*APPL SCI LAB INC, 2004, SER 5000 MOD 501 EY
[4]  
AREND L, 2003, P 12 INT S AV PSYCH, P60
[5]   Integrating cognitive analyses in a large-scale system design process [J].
Bisantz, AM ;
Roth, E ;
Brickman, B ;
Gosbee, LL ;
Hettinger, L ;
McKinney, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 58 (02) :177-206
[6]  
Burns C.M., 2001, Int. J. Cogn. Ergon, V5, P357, DOI [10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503_13, DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503_13]
[7]  
COLLINS RL, 1991, MASTERING SYSTEMS AI
[8]  
Crone D.J., 2003, P HUM FACT ERG SOC 4
[9]  
Evans J. E., 1994, Lincoln Laboratory Journal, V7, P449
[10]   Navigating the territory of job design [J].
Holman, D ;
Clegg, C ;
Waterson, P .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2002, 33 (03) :197-205