Seabed drag coefficient over natural beds of horse mussels (Atrina zelandica)

被引:77
作者
Green, MO [1 ]
Hewitt, JE [1 ]
Thrush, SF [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, NIWA, Hamilton, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1357/002224098765213603
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Measurements of seabed drag coefficient, C-100, were made under tidal currents at four sites in Mahurangi Harbour, New Zealand. At the first three sites the dominant roughness element was the pinnid bivalve, Atrina zelandica (horse mussel). At the fourth site, which was devoid of horse mussels but covered in cockle shells, patches of seaweed and crab burrows, C-100 was smallest (0.0055), but still twice as large as the value typically applied to abiotic, flat, cohesionless seabeds (0.0025). The mean drag coefficient plus-or-minus standard error at the three sites with horse mussels was: 0.0082 +/- 0.0010 (site 1); 0.0096 +/- 0.0009 (site 2); 0.0115 +/- 0.0016 (site 3). There were no clear differences amongst sites 1, 2 and 3 in terms of the attributes of individual horse mussels (e.g. shell height, width or orientation), which could have been used to explain the ranking of the drag coefficients. There were, however, differences amongst the three sites in terms of spatial distribution of individual bivalves. The site with the highest density of horse mussels, site 1, had the lowest drag coefficient and an areal concentration (lambda) of horse mussels higher than typical values cited for the critical concentration (lambda(c)) for the onset of skimming flow over various idealized, three-dimensional roughness elements. At sites 2 and 3, the drag coefficient was given by: C100 = [kappa/In(3000/m kappa lambda)](2) which was valid for lambda < lambda(c), where K is von Karman's constant, k is the horse mussel height (i.e., protrusion above the seabed), m approximate to 100 and lambda(c) approximate to 0.2. The stable eddies that are hypothesized to lodge between roughness elements at concentrations greater than lambda(c) may influence benthic community dynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 637
页数:25
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, SEA IDEAS OBSERVATIO
[2]   RESPONSE OF A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER TO A STEP CHANGE IN SURFACE ROUGHNESS .1. SMOOTH TO ROUGH [J].
ANTONIA, RA ;
LUXTON, RE .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1971, 48 (AUG27) :721-&
[3]   FLUME EXPERIMENTS ON FOOD-SUPPLY TO THE BLUE MUSSEL MYTILUS-EDULIS-L AS A FUNCTION OF BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW [J].
BUTMAN, CA ;
FRECHETTE, M ;
GEYER, WR ;
STARCZAK, VR .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1994, 39 (07) :1755-1768
[4]  
CACCHIONE DA, 1983, 8325 WHOI
[5]   EVIDENCE FOR THE INFLUENCE OF FORM DRAG ON BOTTOM BOUNDARY-LAYER FLOW [J].
CHRISS, TM ;
CALDWELL, DR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1982, 87 (NC6) :4148-4154
[6]   UNIVERSAL SIMILARITY AND THE THICKNESS OF THE VISCOUS SUBLAYER AT THE OCEAN-FLOOR [J].
CHRISS, TM ;
CALDWELL, DR .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1984, 89 (NC4) :6403-6414
[7]  
CUMMINGS VJ, 1998, IN PRESS J EXP MAR B
[8]  
Daily J., 1966, Fluid Dynamics
[9]  
Dietrich W.D., 1982, THESIS U WASHINGTON
[10]   VELOCITY PROFILES OVER A RIPPLED BED AND THE THRESHOLD OF MOVEMENT OF SAND [J].
DYER, KR .
ESTUARINE AND COASTAL MARINE SCIENCE, 1980, 10 (02) :181-199