Economics of the clinical management of lung cancer in France:: an analysis using a Markov model

被引:41
作者
Chouaïd, C
Molinier, L
Combescure, C
Daurès, JP
Housset, B
Vergnenègre, A
机构
[1] Hop St Antoine, Serv Pneumol, F-75571 Paris 12, France
[2] Fac Med, INSERM, U558, Lab Sante Publ & Epidemiol, Toulouse, France
[3] Fac Med Montpellier, Inst Univ Rech Clin, Montpellier, France
[4] Ctr Hosp Intercommunal, Serv Pneumol, Creteil, France
[5] Hop Cluzeau Limoges, Serv Pneumol, Serv Informat Med & Evaluat, Limoges, France
关键词
Markov model; management; lung cancer; economic analysis;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6601547
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To evaluate, according to the histologic type and initial stage, the mean cost (MC) of managing patients with lung cancer and the costs of the different management phases. A Markov approach was used to model these costs, based on the management of a representative nation-wide sample of 428 patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. The 18-month MC ranged from US$ 20 691 (95% Cl: 5777-50 380 for diffuse non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to US$ 31 833 (95% CI: 15 866-64 455) for localised small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); first-line treatment costs ranged from 33.8% of MC for medically inoperable localised NSCLC to 74.6% for diffuse SCLC; second- or third-line treatment costs ranged from 7.8% of MC for surgically treated localised NSCLC to 32% for locally advanced NSCLC; and the cost of palliative care ranged from 9.1% of MC for locally advanced NSCLC to 39.9% for medically inoperable localised NSCLC. The cost of first-line chemotherapy and the percentage of actively treated patients impacted more on MC than did the cost of second- or third-line chemotherapy regimens or the cost of palliative care. In conclusion, this model provides a robust economic analysis of the cost of lung cancer management, and will be useful for assessing the economic consequences of future changes in patient management.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 402
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Arikian S R, 1995, Oncology (Williston Park), V9, P33
[2]   Meta-analysis of single agents in the chemotherapy of NSCLC: what do we want to know? [J].
Bahl, A ;
Falk, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 84 (09) :1143-1145
[3]   Evaluating the financial impact of clinical trials in oncology: Results from a pilot study from the association of American Cancer Institutes/Northwestern University Clinical Trials Costs and Charges Project [J].
Bennett, CL ;
Stinson, TJ ;
Vogel, V ;
Robertson, L ;
Leedy, D ;
O'Brien, P ;
Hobbs, J ;
Sutton, T ;
Ruckdeschel, JC ;
Chirikos, TN ;
Weiner, RS ;
Ramsey, MM ;
Wicha, MS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (15) :2805-2810
[4]   Decision framework for chemotherapeutic interventions for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Berthelot, JM ;
Will, BP ;
Evans, WK ;
Coyle, D ;
Earle, CC ;
Bordeleau, L .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (16) :1321-1329
[5]   Routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is not cost-effective and does not increase patient comfort in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: An analysis using a Markov model [J].
Chouaid, C ;
Bassinet, L ;
Fuhrman, C ;
Monnet, I ;
Housset, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (08) :2700-2707
[6]   Small-cell lung cancer: Patients included in clinical trials are not representative of the patient population as a whole [J].
Cottin, V ;
Arpin, D ;
Lasset, C ;
Cordier, JF ;
Brune, J ;
Chauvin, F ;
Trillet-Lenoir, V .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (07) :809-815
[7]  
DESKY AS, 1990, ANN INTERN MED, V113, P147
[8]  
Doyle JJ, 1996, SEMIN ONCOL, V23, P51
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Earle, CC ;
Evans, WK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 80 (5-6) :815-820
[10]  
Evans W. K., 1997, Seminars in Oncology, V24, pS756