Human behavioral assessment in neurotoxicology: Producing appropriate test performance with written and shaping instructions

被引:42
作者
Anger, WK
Rohlman, DS
Sizemore, OJ
Kovera, CA
Gibertini, M
Ger, J
机构
[1] MIDWEST RES INST, KANSAS CITY, MO 64110 USA
[2] VET GEN HOSP, TAIPEI, TAIWAN
关键词
neurotoxicology; behavioral biomarkers; neuropsychological tests; stimulus control; BARS; Behavioral Assessment and Research System; NES2;
D O I
10.1016/0892-0362(96)00037-2
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Neurotoxic effects are of such breadth and complexity that functional biomarkers (behavioral tests) that integrate many areas of the nervous system predominate in human neurotoxicology research. The increasing distribution of chemical and other manufacturing throughout the world, particularly in developing nations, suggests the acute need to develop biomarkers for chemical exposures and effects that can be employed internationally. A language-free method for training performance on behavioral tests is described, which holds promise for international research that circumvents the vagaries of translation. Four behavioral tests were administered to 74-114 adult US subjects. Procedures, collectively termed shaping, produced effective performance on three tests [Symbol Digit, Vigilant Attention Test (VAT), Digit Span Forward and Backward], and produced appropriate but unacceptably slow performance in initial testing on the Simple Reaction Time test. Effective performance on the Symbol-Digit test also was produced by shaping instructions, without assistance from examiners, in small groups of residents of Taipei (Taiwan) and US children between the ages of 5 and 16.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 379
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Selective approaches to basic neurobehavioral testing of children in environmental health studies
    Amler, RW
    Gibertini, M
    Lybarger, JA
    Hall, A
    Kakolewski, K
    Phifer, BL
    Olsen, KL
    [J]. NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1996, 18 (04) : 429 - 434
  • [2] ANGER WK, 1990, NEUROTOXICOLOGY, V11, P629
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF INSTRUCTION FORMATS FOR ADMINISTERING A COMPUTERIZED BEHAVIORAL-TEST
    ANGER, WK
    ROHLMAN, DS
    SIZEMORE, OJ
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1994, 26 (02): : 209 - 212
  • [4] COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE FROM 3 CONTINENTS ON THE WHO-RECOMMENDED NEUROBEHAVIORAL CORE TEST BATTERY
    ANGER, WK
    CASSITTO, MG
    LIANG, YX
    AMADOR, R
    HOOISMA, J
    CHRISLIP, DW
    MERGLER, D
    KEIFER, M
    HORTNAGL, J
    FOURNIER, L
    DUDEK, B
    ZSOGON, E
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1993, 62 (01) : 125 - 147
  • [5] ANGER WK, 1993, NATO ADV SCI INST SE, V250, P159
  • [6] [Anonymous], SEMIN OCCUP MED
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1992, NEUROTOXICOLOGY
  • [8] [Anonymous], NEUROTOXICOLOGY
  • [9] COMPUTERIZED ASSESSMENT IN NEUROPSYCHOLOGY - A REVIEW OF TESTS AND TEST BATTERIES
    KANE, RL
    KAY, GG
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1992, 3 (01) : 1 - 117
  • [10] A comparison of NES2 and traditional neuropsychological tests in a neurologic patient sample
    Krengel, M
    White, RF
    Diamond, R
    Letz, R
    Cyrus, P
    Durso, R
    [J]. NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 1996, 18 (04) : 435 - 439