MRI vs. histologic measurement of breast cancer following chemotherapy: Comparison with X-ray mammography and palpation

被引:127
作者
Weatherall, PT [1 ]
Evans, GF [1 ]
Metzger, GJ [1 ]
Saborrian, MH [1 ]
Leitch, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Rogers MR Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
关键词
breast neoplasms; MR; staging; malignant neoplasm; comparative studies;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1124
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Twenty consecutive patients with breast cancer were evaluated following chemotherapy using MRI to assess the size of cancer residua and compare these data with subsequent histologic measurements of the viable tumor. This retrospective study also involved assessment of the preoperative size of the malignancy as determined by physical exam and x-ray mammogram. These values were later compared with the histology. The tumor size correlation coefficient between MRI and pathologic analysis was the highest, at 0.93. Physical exam and x-ray mammography (available for 17 patients) produced correlation coefficients of 0.72 and 0.63, respectively, compared to histologic measurement. The accuracy of MRI did not vary with the size of cancer residua. AM is an accurate method for preoperative assessment of breast cancer residua following chemotherapy. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 875
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Abraham DC, 1996, CANCER, V78, P91, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<91::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]   BREAST-TUMORS - COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF MR-IMAGING RELATIVE TO MAMMOGRAPHY AND US FOR DEMONSTRATING EXTENT [J].
BOETES, C ;
MUS, RDM ;
HOLLAND, R ;
BARENTSZ, JO ;
STRIJK, SP ;
WOBBES, T ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
RUYS, SHJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :743-747
[4]   Pre-operative MR-mammography in breast cancer patients [J].
Conrad, C ;
Corfitsen, MT ;
Gyldholm, N ;
Christiansen, FL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (02) :142-145
[5]   Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging [J].
Esserman, L ;
Hylton, N ;
Yassa, L ;
Barclay, J ;
Frankel, S ;
Sickles, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :110-119
[6]   LOCAL ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - CONTRAST-ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR-IMAGING OF RESPONSE TO PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
GILLES, R ;
GUINEBRETIERE, JM ;
TOUSSAINT, C ;
SPIELMAN, M ;
RIETJENS, M ;
PETIT, JY ;
CONTESSO, G ;
MASSELOT, J ;
VANEL, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (03) :633-638
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging and core-needle biopsy in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions [J].
Hrung, JM ;
Langlotz, CP ;
Orel, SG ;
Fox, KR ;
Schnall, MD ;
Schwartz, JS .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) :39-49
[8]   Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging [J].
Mumtaz, H ;
HallCraggs, MA ;
Davidson, T ;
Walmsley, K ;
Thurell, W ;
Kissin, MW ;
Taylor, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (02) :417-424
[9]   STAGING OF SUSPECTED BREAST-CANCER - EFFECT OF MR-IMAGING AND MR-GUIDED BIOPSY [J].
OREL, SG ;
SCHNALL, MD ;
POWELL, CM ;
HOCHMAN, MG ;
SOLIN, LJ ;
FOWBLE, BL ;
TOROSIAN, MH ;
ROSATO, EF .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 196 (01) :115-122
[10]   MRI of breast cancer: Influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity [J].
Rieber, A ;
Zeitler, H ;
Rosenthal, H ;
Gorich, J ;
Kreienberg, R ;
Brambs, HJ ;
Tomczak, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (833) :452-458