Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia

被引:14
作者
Allman, KG
McFadyen, JG
Armstrong, J
Sturrock, GD
Wilson, IH
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
[2] Royal Devon & Exeter Hosp, W England Eye Unit, Exeter EX2 5DW, Devon, England
关键词
surgery; ophthalmological; anaesthetic techniques; regional; peribulbar; anaesthetics local; articaine;
D O I
10.1093/bja/87.4.584
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In a single-centre, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of 2% articaine with that of a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery, using a single medial canthus injection technique. Eighty-two patients were allocated randomly to receive 7-9 ml of a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine or an equal volume of 2% articaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine. Hyaluronidase 30 iu ml(-1) was added to both solutions. The degree of akinesia was scored 1, 5 and 10 min after the block, at the end of surgery and at discharge from the day case unit. Primary outcome measures were the difference in ocular movement scores 5 min after block and the need for supplementary inferolateral injections. There was greater akinesia in the articaine group at 5 min (P=0.01). Ten patients (24%) in the articaine group and 21 patients (51%) in the bupivacaine/lidocaine group required a supplementary injection (P=0.02). The mean (SD) volume of local anaesthetic required to achieve adequate block for surgery was 9.7 (2.1) ml in the articaine group and 11.0 (2.2) ml in the bupivacaine/lidocaine group (P=0.01). There was a faster offset of akinesia after surgery in the articaine group (P=0.01). There were no differences between groups in the incidence of reported pain or of minor complications. In our study, 2% articaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine was safe and efficacious for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia.
引用
收藏
页码:584 / 587
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Postoperative morbidity following cataract surgery - A comparison of local and general anaesthesia [J].
Barker, JP ;
Vafidis, GC ;
Hall, GM .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (05) :435-437
[2]   SINGLE MEDIAL INJECTION PERIBULBAR ANESTHESIA USING PRILOCAINE [J].
BRAHMA, AK ;
PEMBERTON, CJ ;
AYEKO, M ;
MORGAN, LH .
ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (11) :1003-1005
[3]  
Dopfmer UR, 1996, BRIT J ANAESTH, V76, P77
[4]   TECHNIQUES OF ORBITAL REGIONAL ANESTHESIA [J].
HAMILTON, RC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (01) :88-92
[5]   A comparison of 1% ropivacaine with a mixture of 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lignocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia [J].
McLure, HA ;
Rubin, AP ;
Westcott, M ;
Henderson, H .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (12) :1178-1182
[6]   Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine [J].
Oertel, R ;
Rahn, R ;
Kirch, W .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 33 (06) :417-425
[7]   Medial canthus (caruncle) single injection periocular anesthesia [J].
Ripart, J ;
Lefrant, JY ;
Lalourcey, L ;
Benbabaali, M ;
Charavel, P ;
Mainemer, M ;
PratPradal, D ;
Dupeyron, G ;
Eledjam, JJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (06) :1234-1238
[8]   Medial canthus single-injection episcleral (sub-tenon anesthesia): Computed tomography imaging [J].
Ripart, J ;
Metge, L ;
Prat-Pradal, D ;
Lopez, FM ;
Eledjam, EA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (01) :42-45
[9]   COMPLICATIONS OF LOCAL-ANESTHESIA FOR OPHTHALMIC SURGERY [J].
RUBIN, AP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (01) :93-96
[10]  
WINTHER J E, 1974, International Journal of Oral Surgery, V3, P422, DOI 10.1016/S0300-9785(74)80007-4