Modeling quantum measurement probability as a classical stochastic process

被引:3
作者
Gillespie, DT [1 ]
Alltop, WO [1 ]
Martin, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] USN, Res Dept, Air Warfare Ctr, China Lake, CA 93555 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.1378791
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The time-dependent measurement probabilities for the simple two-state quantum oscillator seem to invite description as a classical two-state stochastic process. It has been shown that such a description cannot be achieved using a Markov process. Constructing a more general non-Markov process is a challenging task, requiring as it does the proper generalizations of the Markovian Chapman-Kolmogorov and master equations. Here we describe those non-Markovian generalizations in some detail, and we then apply them to the two-state quantum oscillator. We devise two non-Markovian processes that correctly model the measurement statistics of the oscillator, we clarify a third modeling process that was proposed earlier by others, and we exhibit numerical simulations of all three processes. Our results illuminate some interesting though widely unappreciated points in the theory of non-Markovian stochastic processes. But since quantum theory does not tell us which one of these quite different modeling processes "really" describes the behavior of the oscillator, and also since none of these processes says anything about the dynamics of other (noncommuting) oscillator observables, we can see no justification for regarding any of these processes as being fundamentally descriptive of quantum dynamics. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:548 / 562
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Why quantum mechanics cannot be formulated as a Markov process - Comment [J].
Garbaczewski, P ;
Olkiewicz, R .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 54 (02) :1733-1736
[2]   WHY QUANTUM DYNAMICS CAN BE FORMULATED AS A MARKOV PROCESS [J].
GARBACZEWSKI, P ;
OLKIEWICZ, R .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1995, 51 (05) :3445-3453
[3]  
Gardiner C. W., 1985, HDB STOCHASTIC METHO, V3
[4]   The mathematics of Brownian motion and Johnson noise [J].
Gillespie, DT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1996, 64 (03) :225-240
[5]   WHY QUANTUM-MECHANICS CANNOT BE FORMULATED AS A MARKOV PROCESS [J].
GILLESPIE, DT .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1994, 49 (03) :1607-1612
[6]   Comment on "Describing the state of a stochastic process," by D. T. Gillespie [Am. J. Phys. 66 (6), 533-536 (1998)] [J].
Gillespie, DT ;
Alltop, WO ;
Martin, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1999, 67 (03) :258-259
[7]   Describing the state of a stochastic process [J].
Gillespie, DT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1998, 66 (06) :533-536
[8]  
Gillespie DT, 2000, AIP CONF PROC, V511, P49, DOI 10.1063/1.60002
[9]   The multivariate Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations [J].
Gillespie, DT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1996, 64 (10) :1246-1257
[10]   Why quantum dynamics can be formulated as a Markov process - Comment [J].
Gillespie, DT .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1996, 53 (06) :4602-4604