Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades

被引:627
作者
Epstein, Jonathan I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Feng, Zhaoyong [2 ]
Trock, Bruce J. [2 ,3 ]
Pierorazio, Phillip M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Gleason grade; Needle biopsy; Radical prostatectomy; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; SCORE; RISK; NOMOGRAM; VOLUME; INTERMEDIATE; SPECIMENS; ERROR; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
Background: Prior studies assessing the correlation of Gleason score (GS) at needle biopsy and corresponding radical prostatectomy (RP) predated the use of the modified Gleason scoring system and did not factor in tertiary grade patterns. Objective: To assess the relation of biopsy and RP grade in the largest study to date. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 7643 totally embedded RP and corresponding needle biopsies (2004-2010) were analyzed according to the updated Gleason system. Interventions: All patients underwent prostate biopsy prior to RP. Measurements: The relation of upgrading or downgrading to patient and cancer characteristics was compared using the chi-square test, Student t test, and multivariable logistic regression. Results and limitations: A total of 36.3% of cases were upgraded from a needle biopsy GS 5-6 to a higher grade at RP (11.2% with GS 6 plus tertiary). Half of the cases had matching GS 3 + 4 = 7 at biopsy and RP with an approximately equal number of cases downgraded and upgraded at RP. With biopsy GS 4 + 3 = 7, RP GS was almost equally 3 + 4 = 7 and 4 + 3 = 7. Biopsy GS 8 led to an almost equal distribution between RP GS 4 + 3 = 7, 8, and 9-10. A total of 58% of the cases had matching GS 9-10 at biopsy and RP. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (p < 0.0001), increasing serum prostate-specific antigen level (p < 0.0001), decreasing RP weight (p < 0.0001), and increasing maximum percentage cancer/core (p < 0.0001) predicted the upgrade from biopsy GS 5-6 to higher at RP. Despite factoring in multiple variables including the number of positive cores and the maximum percentage of cancer per core, the concordance indexes were not sufficiently high to justify the use of nomograms for predicting upgrading and downgrading for the individual patient. Conclusions: Almost 20% of RP cases have tertiary patterns. A needle biopsy can sample a tertiary higher Gleason pattern in the RP, which is then not recorded in the standard GS reporting, resulting in an apparent overgrading on the needle biopsy. (C) 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1024
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Amin, Ali ;
Partin, Alan ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04) :1286-1290
[2]
The novel nomogram of Gleason sum upgrade: Possible application for the eligible criteria of low dose rate brachytherapy [J].
Budaeus, Lars ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Salomon, Georg ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Lughezzani, Giovanni ;
Sun, Maxine ;
Chun, Felix K. H. ;
Schlomm, Thorsten ;
Steuber, Thomas ;
Haese, Alexander ;
Koellermann, Jens ;
Sauter, Guido ;
Fisch, Margit ;
Heinzer, Hans ;
Huland, Hartwig ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 (10) :862-868
[3]
Biopsy Core Number Represents One of Foremost Predictors of Clinically Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading in Patients With Low-risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Jeldres, Claudio ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Gallina, Andrea ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Cestari, Andrea ;
Guazzoni, Giorgio ;
Salonia, Andrea ;
Montorsi, Francesco .
UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (05) :1087-1091
[4]
Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range [J].
Colleselli, D. ;
Pelzer, A. E. ;
Steiner, E. ;
Ongarello, S. ;
Schaefer, G. ;
Bartsch, G. ;
Schwentner, C. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2010, 13 (02) :182-185
[5]
Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours [J].
Corcoran, Niall M. ;
Hovens, Chris M. ;
Hong, Matthew K. H. ;
Pedersen, John ;
Casey, Rowan G. ;
Connolly, Stephen ;
Peters, Justin ;
Harewood, Laurence ;
Gleave, Martin E. ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Costello, Anthony J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (05) :660-664
[6]
Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer [J].
Davies, Judson D. ;
Aghazadeh, Monty A. ;
Phillips, Sharon ;
Salem, Shady ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Herrell, S. Duke ;
Penson, David F. ;
Smith, Joseph A., Jr. ;
Barocas, Daniel A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) :2221-2227
[7]
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[8]
A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy gleason score [J].
Fine, Samson W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04) :1335-1338
[9]
Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: Risk factors and clinical implications [J].
Freedland, Stephen J. ;
Kane, Christopher J. ;
Amling, Christopher L. ;
Aronson, William J. ;
Terris, Martha K. ;
Presti, Joseph C., Jr. .
UROLOGY, 2007, 69 (03) :495-499
[10]
Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy gleason score 6 to Harbor a higher grade cancer [J].
Gofrit, Ofer N. ;
Zorn, Kevin C. ;
Taxy, Jerome B. ;
Lin, Shang ;
Zagaja, Gregory P. ;
Steinberg, Gary D. ;
Shalhav, Arieh L. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (05) :1925-1928