Survival from invasive breast cancer among interval cases in the mammography screening programmes of northern Sweden

被引:28
作者
Bordas, P. [1 ,3 ]
Jonsson, H. [1 ]
Nystroem, L. [2 ]
Lenner, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Radiat Sci, Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Umea, Sweden
[3] Sunderby Hosp, Mammog Screening Ctr Norrbotten Cty, S-97180 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
mammography screening; invasive breast cancer; breast cancer survival; interval cases; uninvited cases; detection mode;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2006.05.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to estimate breast cancer survival according to detection mode for 5120 women with invasive breast cancer, in particular for those detected in the screening intervals. We found a significant survival difference in favour of women with cancer detected in the screening intervals (n = 729) compared with those uninvited (n = 1879) during the 13-year follow-up. Detection mode was proven to modify the prognostic effect of stage. Women with stage I interval cancer had shorter survival and those with stage 11 had longer survival than expected. It is suggested that interval cancers might consist of two subgroups with different behaviour: one of fast-growing tumours presenting as stage I cases and another of stow-growing tumours presenting as stage II+ cases. A hypothesis related to this observation is discussed. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING AND MORTALITY FROM BREAST-CANCER - THE MALMO MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING TRIAL [J].
ANDERSSON, I ;
ASPERGREN, K ;
JANZON, L ;
LANDBERG, T ;
LINDHOLM, K ;
LINELL, F ;
LJUNGBERG, O ;
RANSTAM, J ;
SIGFUSSON, B .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6654) :943-948
[2]   SURVIVAL IN INTERVAL BREAST-CANCER IN THE DOM SCREENING-PROGRAM [J].
BREKELMANS, CT ;
PEETERS, PH ;
DEURENBERG, JJ ;
COLLETTE, HJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (11) :1830-1835
[3]   Survival rates from interval cancer in NHS breast screening programme [J].
Collins, S ;
Woodman, CBJ ;
Threlfall, A ;
Prior, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7134) :832-833
[4]   Why improvement in survival of screen-detected cases is not necessarily equivalent to benefit? [J].
de Koning, HJ .
BREAST, 2003, 12 (05) :299-301
[5]   INTERVAL CANCER AND SURVIVAL IN A RANDOMIZED BREAST-CANCER SCREENING TRIAL IN STOCKHOLM [J].
FRISELL, J ;
VONROSEN, A ;
WIEGE, M ;
NILSSON, B ;
GOLDMAN, S .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1992, 24 (01) :11-16
[6]  
HOLMBERG LH, 1986, LANCET, V2, P27
[7]   Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods [J].
Joensuu, H ;
Lehtimäki, T ;
Holli, K ;
Elomaa, L ;
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen, T ;
Kataja, V ;
Anttila, A ;
Lundin, M ;
Isola, J ;
Lundin, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (09) :1064-1073
[8]  
Lenner P, 1997, J Med Screen, V4, P6
[9]   Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: Analysis of randomized screening trials [J].
Shen, Y ;
Yang, Y ;
Inoue, LYT ;
Munsell, MF ;
Miller, AB ;
Berry, DA .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (16) :1195-1203
[10]  
TABAR L, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P187