Auricular rehabilitation by means of bone grafting from the iliac crest in combination with porous extraoral implants: A case report

被引:8
作者
Dib, Luciano Lauria
de Oliveira, Joaquim Augusto Piras
Neves, Rogerio Izar
Sandoval, Renata Lazari
Nannmark, Ulf
机构
[1] Univ Paulista, BR-04511900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Penn State Canc Inst, Hershey, PA USA
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
auricular rehabilitation; extraoral implants; grafting;
D O I
10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00040.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Background: Maxillofacial defects caused by cancer treatment are a huge problem affecting the quality of life of patients. Some of these deformities are minimized using facial epitheses, which need some additional retention devices like glasses or skin adhesives. The use of extraoral fixtures as bone anchorage was introduced many years ago and since then many patients were rehabilitated with better results. Purpose: Because of poor bone conditions, for example, irradiated bone, the success rate of extraoral implants is less than in the oral cavity, causing difficulties to rehabilitation. One possible cause of fixture failure could be the poor primary stability achieved in some cases, hence, with an increased bone contact implant stability and survival could be improved. The present report discusses possibilities to use extraoral fixtures with a modified surface structure. Materials and Methods: A new porous surfaced Brazilian extraoral implant (MasterExtra (R), Conexao, Sistema de Proteses, Sao Paulo, Brazil) was used. A bone transplant from the iliac crest was taken to make it possible to insert at least three extraoral implants for an auricle epithesis. Clinical evaluation and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements were performed during the course of the treatment. Results: Eight months after grafting, four fixtures were inserted. Three fixtures were used for connection of an auricular epithesis. RFA measurements did show high initial values and the values remained stable during the course of the treatment and at later checkups. Conclusion: Porous fixture is a good option in areas where the bone is compromised. RFA is a good tool also in the clinical setting to evaluate immediate and long-term stability of extraoral fixtures.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 232
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1989, ADV OTOLARYNGOL HEAD
[2]
Arcuri M R, 1998, Dent Clin North Am, V42, P161
[3]
Stability measurements of craniofacial implants by means of resonance frequency analysis. A clinical pilot study [J].
Heo, SJ ;
Sennerby, L ;
Odersjo, M ;
Granstrom, G ;
Tjellstrom, A ;
Meredith, N .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1998, 112 (06) :537-542
[4]
Novaes AB, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P377
[5]
Perceived functional impact of abnormal facial appearance [J].
Rankin, M ;
Borah, GL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (07) :2140-2146
[6]
Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits [J].
Suzuki, K ;
Aoki, K ;
Ohya, K .
BONE, 1997, 21 (06) :507-514
[7]
Adjusting to disfigurement: Processes involved in dealing with being visibly different [J].
Thompson, A ;
Kent, G .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 21 (05) :663-682
[8]
Edentulousness and oral rehabilitation:: experiences from the patients' perspective [J].
Trulsson, U ;
Engstrand, P ;
Berggren, U ;
Nannmark, U ;
Brånemark, PI .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2002, 110 (06) :417-424
[9]
Worthington P., 1992, ADV OSSEOINTEGRATION