An ordering heuristic to develop the binary decision diagram based on structural importance

被引:50
作者
Bartlett, LM [1 ]
Andrews, JD [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
关键词
fault tree analysis; binary decision diagrams; variable ordering heuristics; structural importance;
D O I
10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00103-4
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Fault tree analysis is often used to assess risks within industrial systems. The technique is commonly used although there are associated limitations in terms of accuracy and efficiency when dealing with large fault tree structures. The most recent approach to aid the analysis of the fault tree diagram is the Binary Decision Diagram (BDD) methodology. To utilise the technique the fault tree structure needs to be converted into the BDD format. Converting the fault tree requires the basic events of the tree to be placed in an ordering. The ordering of the basic events is critical to the resulting size of the BDD, and ultimately affects the performance and benefits of this technique. A number of heuristic approaches have been developed to produce an optimal ordering permutation for a specific tree. These heuristic approaches do not always yield a minimal BDD structure for all trees. This paper looks at a heuristic that is based on the structural importance measure of each basic event. Comparing the resulting size of the BDD with the smallest generated from a set of six alternative ordering heuristics, this new structural heuristic produced a BDD of smaller or equal dimension on 77% of trials. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
AKERS SB, 1978, IEEE T COMPUT, V27, P509, DOI 10.1109/TC.1978.1675141
[2]  
Andrews J. D., 1998, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (Cat. No.98CH36161), P61, DOI 10.1109/RAMS.1998.653583
[3]   An ordering heuristic for building binary decision diagrams from fault-trees [J].
Bouissou, M .
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 1996 PROCEEDINGS, 1996, :208-214
[4]  
BOUISSOU M, 1997, P ESREL 97 C AUG
[5]  
BRYANT RE, 1986, IEEE T COMPUT, V35, P677, DOI 10.1109/TC.1986.1676819
[6]  
Fujita M., 1988, IEEE International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, ICCAD-88. Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Cat. No.88CH2657-5), P2, DOI 10.1109/ICCAD.1988.122450
[7]  
Lambert H., 1975, RELIABILITY FAULT TR, P77
[8]  
MINATO S, 1991, P EUR C DES AUT, P50
[9]   NEW ALGORITHMS FOR FAULT-TREES ANALYSIS [J].
RAUZY, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1993, 40 (03) :203-211
[10]  
RAUZY A, 1995, ESREL 95: EUROPEAN SAFETY AND RELIABILITY CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P190