Welfare-reducing growth despite individual and government optimization

被引:23
作者
Ng, S [1 ]
Ng, YK [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Econ, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s003550000081
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the presence of substantial relative-income effects and environmental disruption effects, economic growth may be welfare-reducing even if each and all individuals are optimizing and eagerly trying to make more money and the government also maximizes the welfare of individuals by the choice of income-tax rate and the ratio devoted to the abatement of environmental disruption. Welfare-reducing growth may be avoided if environmental disruption may be directed taxed at low costs and/or government spending on public goods is not environmentally disruptive.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 506
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction [J].
Cummins, RA .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1998, 43 (03) :307-334
[2]   Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators [J].
Diener, E ;
Suh, E .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (1-2) :189-216
[3]  
Easterlin R., 1974, NATIONS HOUSEHOLDS E
[4]  
EASTERLY W, 1997, LIFE GROWTH
[5]   The frame of reference as a public good [J].
Frank, RH .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1997, 107 (445) :1832-1847
[6]  
MYERS D, 1996, SOC PSYCHOL
[8]   Utility, informed preference, or happiness: Following Harsanyi's argument to its logical conclusion [J].
Ng, YK .
SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1999, 16 (02) :197-216
[9]   A case for happiness, cardinalism, and interpersonal comparability [J].
Ng, YK .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1997, 107 (445) :1848-1858
[10]  
NY YK, 1993, MATH SOC SCI, V26, P287