Static rearfoot alignment - A comparison of clinical and radiographic measures

被引:55
作者
Lamm, BM
Mendicino, RW
Catanzariti, AR
Hillstrom, HJ
机构
[1] Sinai Hosp, Rubin Inst Adv Orthoped, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA
[2] Western Penn Hosp, Div Foot & Ankle Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15224 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Sch Podiatr Med, Dept Orthoped, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7547/0950026
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Foot structure is typically evaluated using static clinical and radiographic measures. To date, the literature is devoid of a correlation between rearfoot frontal plane radiographic parameters and clinical measures of alignment. In a repeated-measures study comparing radiographic and clinical rearfoot alignment in 24 healthy subjects, radiographic angular measurements were made from standard weightbearing anteroposterior, lateral, long leg calcaneal axial, and rearfoot alignment views. Clinical measurements were made using a jig and scanner to assess the malleolar valgus index and a goniometer to evaluate the resting and neutral calcaneal stance positions. There was a significant correlation between frontal plane radiographic angles (long leg calcaneal axial and rearfoot alignment views) (r = 0.814). Similarly, there was a significant correlation between clinical measures (resting calcaneal stance position and malleolar valgus index) (r = 0.714). A multivariate stepwise regression showed that resting calcaneal stance position can be accurately predicted from 3 of the 15 clinical and radiographic measurements collected: malleolar valgus index, rearfoot alignment view, and long leg calcaneal axial view (r = 0.829). In summary, a commonly used clinical measure of static rearfoot alignment, resting calcaneal stance position, was correlated closely with the malleolar valgus index and both frontal plane radiographic parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 33
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
THE OPTIMUM POSITION OF ARTHRODESIS OF THE ANKLE - A GAIT STUDY OF THE KNEE AND ANKLE [J].
BUCK, P ;
MORREY, BF ;
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (07) :1052-1062
[2]
COBEY JC, 1976, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P202
[3]
GONIOMETRIC RELIABILITY IN A CLINICAL SETTING - SUBTALAR AND ANKLE JOINT MEASUREMENTS [J].
ELVERU, RA ;
ROTHSTEIN, JM ;
LAMB, RL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1988, 68 (05) :672-677
[4]
HARRIS RI, 1948, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V78, P116
[5]
Hindfoot coronal alignment: A modified radiographic method [J].
Johnson, JE ;
Lamdan, R ;
Granberry, WF ;
Harris, GF ;
Carrera, GF .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 20 (12) :818-825
[6]
A ROENTGENOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CALCANEUS BY MEANS OF THE POSTERIOR TANGENTIAL VIEW [J].
KLEIGER, B ;
MANKIN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1961, 43 (07) :961-969
[7]
Paley D, 2002, Principles of deformity correction, P571
[8]
ROOT ML, 1971, BIOMECHANICAL EXAMIN
[9]
THE HINDFOOT ALIGNMENT VIEW [J].
SALTZMAN, CL ;
ELKHOURY, GY .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 16 (09) :572-576
[10]
Foot type biomechanics - Comparison of planus and rectus foot types [J].
Song, JS ;
Hillstrom, HJ ;
Secord, D ;
Levitt, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 86 (01) :16-23