The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies

被引:338
作者
Scheufele, DA
Lewenstein, BV
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison Sch Journalism & Mass Commun, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Commun, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Sci & Technol Studies, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
risk perceptions; public understanding; public opinion; media coverage; framing; cognitive miser model; nanotechnology;
D O I
10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
We report findings from a national telephone survey on levels of knowledge about and attitudes toward nanotechnology that demonstrate how people make decisions about emerging technologies. Our findings confirm previous research that suggests that people form opinions and attitudes even in the absence of relevant scientific or policy-related information. In fact, our data show that cognitive shortcuts or heuristics - often provided by mass media - are currently a key factor in influencing how the public thinks about nanotechnology and about its risks and benefits, and in determining the level of support among the public for further funding for research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 667
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, RATIONAL PUBLIC
[3]  
Bainbridge WS, 2002, J NANOPART RES, V4, P561
[4]  
Bauer M., 1993, Public Understanding of Science, V2, P141, DOI 10.1088/0963-6625/2/2/004
[5]   Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust [J].
Cobb, MD ;
Macoubrie, J .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (04) :395-405
[6]   Assessing the capacity of mass electorates [J].
Converse, PE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 3 :331-353
[7]  
Fiske ST., 1991, SOC COGNITION
[8]   Public attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the United States [J].
Gaskell, G ;
Ten Eyck, T ;
Jackson, J ;
Veltri, G .
NATURE MATERIALS, 2004, 3 (08) :496-496
[9]   Framing responsibility for political issues [J].
Iyengar, S .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1996, 546 :59-70
[10]  
KUNREUTHER HC, 2001, WHARTON MAKING DECIS, P259