Radical vaginal trachelectomy (Dargent's operation): A critical review of the literature

被引:69
作者
Dursun, P. [1 ]
LeBlanc, E.
Nogueira, M. C.
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ctr Oscar Lambret, Dept Gynecol Oncol, F-59020 Lille, France
[3] Santa Rita Canc Ctr, Gynecol Oncol Grp, Complexo Hosp Santa Casa, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
EJSO | 2007年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
cervical carcinoma; fertility saving; radical vaginal trachelectomy; trachelectomy; dargent operation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.11.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: To present a review of the most recent articles about radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT). Methods: Recent literature has been reviewed, concentrating on surgical, oncological and obstetrical outcome of RVT. Data for this review were identified by searches of PubMed, and references from relevant articles using the search terms "trachelectomy" and "radical vaginal trachelectomy", "cervical carcinoma", and "fertility saving". Findings: Although a considerable number of women in their reproductive years have been diagnosed with cervical carcinoma, conservative management of early-stage cervical carcinoma did not come into practice until the beginning of the new millennium. To date, 7 gynecologic oncologic centers worldwide have reported oncological and pregnancy outcomes since Dargent made his first announcement of radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) in 1994. Recurrence and death rates (4.2% and 2.8%, respectively) of RVT seem to be comparable to classical radical abdominal hysterectomy. It appears that RVT's overall recurrence and death rates were similar to early-stage cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy (RH) or radiotherapy. Furthermore fertility results of. RVT seem to be promising. A 70% pregnancy rate was reported in the women who wanted to conceive following RVT, though such patients should be informed about the risk of second trimester loss and preterm delivery. On the other hand, there is a lack of satisfactory information about the follow-up of post-RVT patients, both after the operation and during subsequent pregnancy. Conclusion: RVT looks as if it is a valid uterus-conserving surgery for women of reproductive age who have early-stage cervical carcinoma. However, in order to reach a final conclusion about the oncological and obstetrical results, further studies are needed with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 941
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Pediatric radical abdominal trachelectomy for cervical clear cell carcinoma: A novel surgical approach [J].
Abu-Rustum, NR ;
Su, W ;
Levine, DA ;
Boyd, J ;
Sonoda, Y ;
LaQuaglia, MP .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (01) :296-300
[2]  
ABUREL E, 1981, CHIRURG GYNECOLOGICA, P714
[3]   Surgical morbidity associated with radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy [J].
Alexander-Sefre, F ;
Chee, N ;
Spencer, C ;
Menon, U ;
Shepherd, JH .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 101 (03) :450-454
[4]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2006, CANC FACTS FIG 2006
[5]   Central pelvic recurrence 7 years after radical vaginal trachelectomy [J].
Bali, A ;
Weekes, A ;
Van Trappen, P ;
Jeyarajah, A ;
Querleu, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 96 (03) :854-856
[6]   Pregnancy outcomes in patients after radical trachelectomy [J].
Bernardini, M ;
Barrett, J ;
Seaward, G ;
Covens, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (05) :1378-1382
[7]   Pregnancy after radical trachelectomy: A real option? [J].
Boss, EA ;
van Golde, RJT ;
Beerendonk, CCM ;
Massuger, LFAG .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 99 (03) :S152-S156
[8]  
BURGHARDT E, 1977, OBSTET GYNECOL, V49, P641
[9]   Radical vaginal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical carcinoma [J].
Burnett, AF ;
Roman, LD ;
O'Meara, AT ;
Morrow, CP .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 88 (03) :419-423
[10]   Laparoscopic abdominal radical trachelectomy [J].
Cibula, D ;
Ungár, L ;
Pálfalvi, L ;
Binó, B ;
Kuzel, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (02) :707-709