Determining the acceptance of cadaveric livers using an implicit model of the waiting list

被引:74
作者
Alagoz, Oguzhan [1 ]
Maillart, Lisa M.
Schaefer, Andrew J.
Roberts, Mark S.
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Weatherhead Sch Management, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Ind Engn & Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Sect Decis Sci & Clin Syst Modeling, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1287/opre.1060.0329
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The only available therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease is organ transplantation. In the United States, patients with end-stage liver disease are placed on a waiting list and offered livers based on location and waiting time, as well as current and past health. Although there is a shortage of cadaveric livers, 45% of all cadaveric liver offers are declined by the first transplant surgeon and/or patient to whom they are offered. We consider the decision problem faced by these patients: Should an offered organ of a given quality be accepted or declined? We formulate a Markov decision process model in which the state of the process is described by patient state and organ quality. We use a detailed model of patient health to estimate the parameters of our decision model and implicitly consider the effects of the waiting list through our patient-state-dependent definition of the organ arrival probabilities. We derive structural properties of the model, including a set of intuitive conditions that ensure the existence of control-limit optimal policies. We use clinical data in our computational experiments, which confirm that the optimal policy is typically of control-limit type.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 36
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Involving patients in the cadaveric kidney transplant allocation process: A decision-theoretic perspective [J].
Ahn, JH ;
Hornberger, JC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (05) :629-641
[2]   Incorporating biological natural history in simulation models: Empirical estimates of the progression of end-stage liver disease [J].
Alagoz, O ;
Bryce, CL ;
Shechter, S ;
Schaefer, A ;
Chang, CCH ;
Angus, DC ;
Roberts, MS .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 25 (06) :620-632
[3]   The optimal timing of living-donor liver transplantation [J].
Alagoz, O ;
Maillart, LM ;
Schaefer, AJ ;
Roberts, MS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (10) :1420-1430
[4]  
Alexander JW, 1996, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V10, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U PITTSBURGH
[6]  
Banjevic D, 2001, INFOR, V39, P32
[7]  
Barlow RE, 1965, MATH THEORY RELIABIL
[8]  
Bellman R., 1957, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
[9]   Risk factors for death following liver retransplantation [J].
Bilbao, I ;
Figueras, J ;
Grande, L ;
Clèries, M ;
Jaurrieta, E ;
Visa, J ;
Margarit, C .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (05) :1871-1873
[10]   Optimality of randomized strategies in a Markovian replacement model [J].
Bruns, P .
MATHEMATICAL METHODS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 56 (03) :481-499