Comparison of 'model-free' and 'model-based' linkage statistics in the presence of locus heterogeneity: Single data set and multiple data set applications

被引:33
作者
Huang, J
Vieland, VJ
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Stat & Actuarial Sci, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biostat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Psychiat, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
locus heterogeneity; model-free test; model-based test; multiple samples;
D O I
10.1159/000053345
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Earlier work [Knapp et al.: Hum Hered 1994;44:44-51] focusing on affected sib pair (ASP) data established the equivalence between the mean test and a test based on a simple recessive lod score, as well as equivalences between certain forms of the maximum likelihood score (MLS) statistic [Risch: Am J Hum Genet 1990;46:242-253] and particular forms of the lod score. Here we extend the results of Knapp et al, [1994] by reconsidering these equivalences for ASP data, but in the presence of locus heterogeneity. We show that Risch's MLS statistic under the possible triangle constraints [Holmans: Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:362-374] is locally equivalent to the ordinary heterogeneity rod score assuming a simple recessive model (HLOD/R); while the one-parameter MLS assuming no dominance variance is locally equivalent to the (homogeneity) recessive led. The companion paper (this issue, pp 199-208) showed that when considering multiple data sets in the presence of locus heterogeneity, the HLOD can suffer appreciable losses in power. We show here that in ASP data, these equivalences ensure that this same loss in power is incurred by both forms of the MLS statistic as well, The companion paper also introduced an adaptation of the led, the compound lod score (HLOD/C). We confirm that the HLOD/C maintains higher power than these 'model-free' methods when applied to multiple heterogeneous data sets, even when it is calculated assuming the wrong genetic model. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 225
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Bailey A, 1998, HUM MOL GENET, V7, P571
[2]  
Barrett S, 1999, AM J MED GENET, V88, P609
[3]  
BLACKWELDER W C, 1985, Genetic Epidemiology, V2, P85, DOI 10.1002/gepi.1370020109
[4]   ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE LIKELIHOOD RATIO [J].
CHERNOFF, H .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1954, 25 (03) :573-578
[5]   EFFECTS OF MIS-SPECIFYING GENETIC-PARAMETERS IN LOD SCORE ANALYSIS [J].
CLERGETDARPOUX, F ;
BONAITIPELLIE, C ;
HOCHEZ, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1986, 42 (02) :393-399
[6]  
COX D. R., 2000, Theoretical Statistics
[7]   MAN BITES DOG - THE VALIDITY OF MAXIMIZING LOD SCORES TO DETERMINE MODE OF INHERITANCE [J].
ELSTON, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1989, 34 (04) :487-488
[8]   LINKAGE ANALYSIS UNDER RANDOM AND GENETIC REDUCED PENETRANCE [J].
GREENBERG, DA ;
HODGE, SE .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 6 (01) :259-264
[9]   INFERRING MODE OF INHERITANCE BY COMPARISON OF LOD SCORES [J].
GREENBERG, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1989, 34 (04) :480-486
[10]   LODS, WRODS, AND MODS - THE INTERPRETATION OF LOD SCORES CALCULATED UNDER DIFFERENT MODELS [J].
HODGE, SE ;
ELSTON, RC .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 11 (04) :329-342