Metaphyseal Fracture Healing follows Similar Biomechanical Rules as Diaphyseal Healing

被引:63
作者
Claes, Lutz [1 ]
Reusch, Martina [1 ]
Goeckelmann, Melanie [1 ]
Ohnmacht, Michael [1 ]
Wehner, Tim [1 ]
Amling, Michael [2 ]
Beil, Frank T. [2 ]
Ignatius, Anita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Inst Orthopaed Res & Biomech, Ctr Musculoskeletal Res, Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Osteol & Biomech, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
bone healing; metaphyseal; biomechanics; histology; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; TIBIAL FRACTURES; BONE; STABILITY; CALLUS; PHASE; MODEL; GAP;
D O I
10.1002/jor.21227
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
It is generally supposed that the pattern of fracture healing in trabecular metaphyseal bone differs from that of diaphyseal fractures. However, few experimental studies to date have been performed, even though clinically many fractures occur in metaphyseal bone. Particularly, the influence of biomechanical factors has not yet been investigated under standardized conditions. Our aim was to correlate the interfragmentary strain (IFS) with the bone-healing outcome in a controlled metaphyseal fracture model in sheep. Twelve sheep received a partial osteotomy in the distal femoral condyle close to the trochlea. The determination of the IFS by in vivo X-ray analyses and a finite element model revealed that the deflection of the osteotomy gap by the patello-femoral force during walking provoked increasing strains of up to 40%. Bone healing was evaluated after 8 weeks by the assessment of the bone mineral density and by histomorphometry in regions of interest that displayed differing magnitudes of IFS. In areas with strains below 5% significantly less hone formation occurred compared to areas with higher strains (6-20%). For strains larger than 20% fibrocartilage layers were observed. Low IFS (<5%) led to intramembranous bone formation, whereas higher strains additionally provoked endochondral ossification or fibrocartilage formation. It is therefore proposed that metaphyseal bone healing follows similar biomechanical principles as diaphyseal healing. (C) 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:425-432,2011
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 432
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
ARONSON J, 1994, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P25
[2]
Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing [J].
Claes, L ;
Augat, P ;
Suger, G ;
Wilke, HJ .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1997, 15 (04) :577-584
[3]
The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing [J].
Claes, L ;
Eckert-Hübner, K ;
Augat, P .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2002, 20 (05) :1099-1105
[4]
Low-intensity ultrasound enhances maturation of callus after segmental transport [J].
Claes, L ;
Rüter, A ;
Mayr, E .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2005, (430) :189-194
[5]
EFFECT OF DYNAMIZATION ON GAP HEALING OF DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES UNDER EXTERNAL FIXATION [J].
CLAES, LE ;
WILKE, HJ ;
AUGAT, P ;
RUBENACKER, S ;
MARGEVICIUS, KJ .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (05) :227-234
[6]
Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing [J].
Claes, LE ;
Heigele, CA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (03) :255-266
[7]
A novel model to study metaphyseal bone healing under defined biomechanical conditions [J].
Claes, Lutz ;
Veeser, Andreas ;
Goeckelmann, Melanie ;
Simon, Ulrich ;
Ignatius, Anita .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2009, 129 (07) :923-928
[8]
Instability prolongs the chondral phase during bone healing in sheep [J].
Epari, Devakara R. ;
Schell, Hanna ;
Bail, Hermann J. ;
Duda, Georg N. .
BONE, 2006, 38 (06) :864-870
[9]
Structural and cellular differences between metaphyseal and diaphyseal periosteum in different aged rats [J].
Fan, Wei ;
Crawford, Ross ;
Xiao, Yin .
BONE, 2008, 42 (01) :81-89
[10]
THE INFLUENCE OF INDUCED MICROMOVEMENT UPON THE HEALING OF EXPERIMENTAL TIBIAL FRACTURES [J].
GOODSHIP, AE ;
KENWRIGHT, J .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1985, 67 (04) :650-655