Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation - An experimental study in the rat

被引:68
作者
Lundgren, A
Lundgren, D
Taylor, A
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Inst Surg Sci, Dept Biomat Handicap Res, S-41390 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Inst Postgrad Dent Educ, Jonkoping, Sweden
关键词
guided bone augmentation; barrier occlusiveness; rat model;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090406.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The present study was designed to test perforated and non-perforated barriers for their ability to promote augmentation of bone tissue. More specifically, 1 totally occlusive barrier and 6 barriers with perforation sizes of about 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 300 mu m and 1 group with no barriers placed (open test chambers) were used to test the effect of a barrier's occlusiveness on the amount and composition of augmented tissue over time. The skull of the rat was used as the experimental area. Prefabricated, flexible silicone frames with an inferior flange for peripheral sealing to the bone surface and a central Vertical through hole with a diameter of 3.6 mm and a height of 2 mm were used as test chambers. The barriers were inserted to cover the superior opening of the through hole. The healing periods were 4, 8, and 12 weeks. All test chambers exhibited newly formed skull bone which was augmented over time. The placement of totally occlusive barriers resulted in the slowest rate of bone tissue augmentation but in a highly predictable manner, i.e., there were only small individual variations. Placement of barriers with perforations exceeding 10 mu m, on the other hand, resulted in a faster rate of bone augmentation with larger individual variations and a totally different augmentation pattern. A pronounced augmentation of calvarial soft tissue from the sagittal suture of the skull as well as ingrowth of suprabony connective tissue through the barriers were also observed. After 12 weeks of healing, no differences in the amount of augmented mineralized bone related to perforation sizes >10 mu m were found. The open test chambers also showed bone augmentation, although most of their volume was occupied by suprabony connective tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 260
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
The biological effect of natural bone mineral on bone neoformation on the rabbit skull [J].
Hammerle, CHF ;
Olah, AJ ;
Schmid, J ;
Fluckiger, L ;
Gogolewski, S ;
Winkler, JR ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (03) :198-207
[2]
GUIDED BONE REGENERATION IN MANDIBULAR DEFECTS IN RATS USING A BIORESORBABLE POLYMER [J].
KOSTOPOULOS, L ;
KARRING, T .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1994, 5 (02) :66-74
[3]
FORMATION OF JAWBONE TUBEROSITIES BY GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN THE RAT [J].
KOSTOPOULOS, L ;
KARRING, T ;
URAGUCHI, R .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1994, 5 (04) :245-253
[4]
AUGMENTATION OF THE RAT MANDIBLE USING GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION [J].
KOSTOPOULOS, L ;
KARRING, T .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1994, 5 (02) :75-82
[5]
CREATION OF NEW BONE BY AN OSTEOPROMOTIVE MEMBRANE TECHNIQUE - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN RATS [J].
LINDE, A ;
THOREN, C ;
DAHLIN, C ;
SANDBERG, E .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1993, 51 (08) :892-897
[6]
AUGMENTATION OF INTRAMEMBRANOUS BONE BEYOND THE SKELETAL ENVELOPE USING AN OCCLUSIVE TITANIUM BARRIER - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN THE RABBIT [J].
LUNDGREN, D ;
LUNDGREN, AK ;
SENNERBY, L ;
NYMAN, S .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1995, 6 (02) :67-72
[7]
MEMBRANE-PERMEABILITY IS UNNECESSARY FOR GUIDED GENERATION OF NEW BONE - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN THE RABBIT [J].
SCHMID, J ;
HAMMERLE, CHF ;
OLAH, AJ ;
LANG, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1994, 5 (03) :125-130
[8]
Blood-filled spaces with and without filler materials in guided bone regeneration - A comparative experimental study in the rabbit using bioresorbable membranes [J].
Schmid, J ;
Hammerle, CHF ;
Fluckiger, L ;
Winkler, JR ;
Olah, AJ ;
Gogolewski, S ;
Lang, NP .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (02) :75-81
[9]
PRACTICAL STEREOLOGICAL METHODS FOR MORPHOMETRIC CYTOLOGY [J].
WEIBEL, ER ;
KISTLER, GS ;
SCHERLE, WF .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1966, 30 (01) :23-&