Escherichia coli-milk biofilm removal from stainless steel surfaces:: Synergism between ultrasonic waves and enzymes

被引:65
作者
Oulahal-Lagsir, O
Martial-Gros, A
Bonneau, M
Blum, LJ
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, IUT Genie Biol A, Lab Rech Genie Ind Alimentaire, F-01060 Bourg En Bresse 9, France
[2] Rhone Alpes Food Res Ctr, Raliment, F-01060 Bourg En Bresse, France
[3] Ecole Natl Vet, Lab Microbiol & Epidemiol Mol, Lyon, France
[4] Univ Lyon 1, Lab Genie Enzymat & Biomol, CNRS, UPRESA 5013, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
milk biofilm; ultrasound; enzymes; stainless steel surfaces; Escherichia coli; closed surfaces;
D O I
10.1080/0892701031000064676
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 [微生物学]; 0836 [生物工程]; 090102 [作物遗传育种]; 100705 [微生物与生化药学];
摘要
Three different methods to standardize biofilm removal for in situ sanitary control of closed surfaces in the food industry have been developed and compared, i.e. sonication, enzymatic treatment and a combined treatment which involved the application of ultrasound to enzyme preparations. The biofilm studied was an Escherichia coli model biofilm, made with milk on stainless steel sheets. Plate counting and epifluorescence microscopy were used to assess the efficiency of each treatment. The results are expressed in percentages, 100% denoting total removal, obtained with a flat ultrasonic transducer (T1) developed and presented in a previous study. The application of ultrasound by a patented curved transducer, T2 (10 s, 40 kHz), specifically devised for closed surfaces, was not sufficient to completely remove the biofilm (30+/-7%). This biofilm was dislodged by two proteolytic enzyme preparations tested by immersion, viz . a 15-min application of protease (84+/-1%) and a 30-min trypsin application (95+/-8%). Using a combined treatment, the results showed a synergism between ultrasonic waves and proteolytic or glycolytic enzyme preparations, with removal of a significant amount of biofilm, i.e. 61-96% depending on the conditions tested, i.e. two to three times greater compared to sonication alone (30%). This application was in agreement with an industrial control, i.e. a good reproducible recovery of the biofilm in 10 s compared with 30 or 15 min with the enzyme alone.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 168
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
Aldridge I.Y., 1994, European Patent, Patent No. [EP0590746 A1, 590746]
[2]
BANKS MK, 1992, BIOFOULING, V6, P81
[3]
The effects of ultrasound on the activities of some glycosidase enzymes of industrial importance [J].
Barton, S ;
Bullock, C ;
Weir, D .
ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 18 (03) :190-194
[4]
BEECH IB, 1991, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V35, P65, DOI 10.1007/BF00180638
[5]
SHELF STABILITY AND SAFETY OF FRESH PRODUCE AS INFLUENCED BY SANITATION AND DISINFECTION [J].
BRACKETT, RE .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1992, 55 (10) :808-814
[6]
Brisou J.F., 1995, Biofilms: Methods for Enzymatic Release of Microorganisms
[7]
BIOFILMS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO HYGIENE IN THE FOOD-INDUSTRY [J].
CARPENTIER, B ;
CERF, O .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1993, 75 (06) :499-511
[8]
Determination of nutrients limiting biofilm formation and the subsequent impact on disinfectant decay [J].
Chandy, JP ;
Angles, ML .
WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (11) :2677-2682
[9]
FOULING BIOFILM DEVELOPMENT - A PROCESS ANALYSIS [J].
CHARACKLIS, WG .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1981, 23 (09) :1923-1960
[10]
INTERACTION OF THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND WITH PURIFIED ENZYMES INVITRO [J].
CHETVERIKOVA, EP ;
PASHOVKIN, TN ;
ROSANOVA, NA ;
SARVAZYAN, AP ;
WILLIAMS, AR .
ULTRASONICS, 1985, 23 (04) :183-188