Discourse on disability and rehabilitation issues - Opportunities for psychology

被引:50
作者
Pledger, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Disabil & Rehabil Res, Washington, DC 20202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.58.4.279
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There are noteworthy differences between the old and new paradigms of disability perspective, particularly in the way that disability is measured, defined, and understood. The new paradigm emphasizes the dynamic intersection of environmental factors and individual characteristics and the role this intersection plays in shaping the disability experience. In contrast the old paradigm of disability is reductive to pathology and emphasizes individual disability characteristics and deficits. In addition to a discussion of the old and new paradigms of disability, the author summarizes the fundamental theoretical frameworks that have influenced the current state of the Science in disability and rehabilitation and offers an overview of definitions, terminology, and models of disability. The author concludes with an overview of the articles in this section.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 284
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AGING DISABILITY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[3]  
Brandt E.N., 1997, ENABLING AM ASSESSIN
[4]   TOWARD AN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY OF HUMAN-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BRONFENBRENNER, U .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1977, 32 (07) :513-531
[5]  
Bronfenbrenner U., 1979, The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design
[6]  
BUSH GW, 2001, NEW FREEDOM INITIATI
[7]   The lived experience of cardiac disease [J].
Margolis, Stephen A. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 51 (09) :645-645
[8]   Transforming psychological practice and society - Policies that reflect the new paradigm [J].
Gill, CJ ;
Kewman, DG ;
Brannon, RW .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 58 (04) :305-312
[9]  
Jette A.M., 2000, SURVEY MEASUREMENT W, P4
[10]  
MATHIOWETZ N, 2000, SURVEY MEASUREMENT W, P28