Evaluation of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage breast cancer

被引:73
作者
Barranger, E
Grahek, D
Antoine, M
Montravers, F
Talbot, JN
Uzan, S
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Dept Gynecol & Breast Canc, F-75020 Paris, France
[2] Hop Tenon, Dept Nucl Med, F-75020 Paris, France
[3] Hop Tenon, Dept Pathol, F-75020 Paris, France
关键词
fluorodeoxyglucose; positron emission tomography; sentinel lymph node; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1245/ASO.2003.12.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) to determine axillary lymph node status in patients with breast cancer undergoing sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Methods: Thirty-two patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes were recruited. All patients underwent FDG-PET before SN biopsy. After SN biopsy, all patients underwent complete axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection. Results: The SNs were identified in all patients. Fourteen patients (43.8%) had metastatic SNs (macrometastatic in seven, micrometastatic in six, and isolated tumor cells in one). The false-negative rate of SN biopsy was 6.6% (1 in 15). FDG-PET identified lymph node metastases in 3 of the 14 patients with positive SNs. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of axillary metastasis were 20%, 100%, 100%, and 58.6%, respectively. No false-positive findings were obtained with FDG-PET. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the limitations of FDG-PET in the detection of ALN metastases in patients with early breast cancer. In contrast, FDG-PET seems to be a specific method for staging the axilla in breast cancer. SN biopsy can be avoided in patients with positive FDG-PET, in whom complete ALN dissection should be the primary procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 627
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma [J].
Acland, KM ;
Healy, C ;
Calonje, E ;
O'Doherty, M ;
Nunan, T ;
Page, C ;
Higgins, E ;
Russell-Jones, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (10) :2674-2678
[2]   Axillary lymph node metastases: Screening with [F-18]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET [J].
Adler, LP ;
Faulhaber, PF ;
Schnur, KC ;
AlKasi, NL ;
Shenk, RR .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (02) :323-327
[3]   LONG-TERM EFFECT OF INTERNAL MAMMARY CHAIN TREATMENT - RESULTS OF A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF 1195 PATIENTS WITH OPERABLE BREAST-CANCER AND POSITIVE AXILLARY NODES [J].
ARRIAGADA, R ;
LE, MG ;
MOURIESSE, H ;
FONTAINE, F ;
DEWAR, J ;
ROCHARD, F ;
SPIELMANN, M ;
LACOUR, J ;
TUBIANA, M ;
SARRAZIN, D .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (03) :213-222
[4]   Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose [J].
Avril, N ;
Dose, J ;
Janicke, F ;
Ziegler, S ;
Romer, W ;
Weber, W ;
Herz, M ;
Nathrath, W ;
Graeff, H ;
Schwaiger, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (17) :1204-1209
[5]  
CARTER CL, 1989, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V63, P181, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19890101)63:1<181::AID-CNCR2820630129>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-H
[7]   INTERNAL MAMMARY NODE STATUS - A MAJOR PROGNOSTICATOR IN AXILLARY NODE-NEGATIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
CODY, HS ;
URBAN, JA .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 2 (01) :32-37
[8]  
Cox C E, 1999, Surg Oncol Clin N Am, V8, P447
[9]   LYMPHATIC MAPPING AND SENTINEL LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
GIULIANO, AE ;
KIRGAN, DM ;
GUENTHER, JM ;
MORTON, DL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (03) :391-401
[10]   Axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer by 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography: Clinical evaluation and alternative management [J].
Greco, M ;
Crippa, F ;
Agresti, R ;
Seregni, E ;
Gerali, A ;
Giovanazzi, R ;
Micheli, A ;
Asero, S ;
Ferraris, C ;
Gennaro, M ;
Bombardieri, E ;
Cascinelli, N .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (08) :630-635