Chest pain evaluation in the emergency department: Can MDCT provide a comprehensive evaluation?

被引:150
作者
White, CS
Kuo, D
Kelemen, M
Jain, V
Musk, A
Zaidi, E
Read, K
Sliker, C
Prasad, R
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Philips Med Syst, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850533
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine whether MDCT can provide a comprehensive assessment of cardiac and noncardiac causes of chest pain in stable emergency department patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Patients with chest pain who presented to the emergency department without definitive findings of acute myocardial infarction based on history, physical examination, and ECG were recruited immediately after the initial clinical assessment. For each patient, the emergency department physician was asked whether a CT scan would normally have been ordered on clinical grounds (e.g., to exclude pulmonary embolism). Each consenting patient underwent enhanced ECG-gated 16-MDCT. Ten cardiac phases were reconstructed. The images were evaluated for cardiac (coronary calcium and stenosis, ejection fraction, and wall motion and pet-fusion) and significant noncardiac (pulmonary embolism, dissection, pneumonia, and so forth) causes of chest pain. Correlation was made between the presence of significant cardiac and noncardiac findings on CT and the final clinical diagnosis based on history, examination, and any subsequent cardiac workup at the 1-month follow-up by a consensus of three physicians. RESULTS. Sixty-nine patients met all criteria for enrollment in the study, of whom 45 (65%) would not otherwise have undergone CT. Fifty-two patients (75%) had no significant CT findings and a final diagnosis of clinically insignificant chest pain. Thirteen patients (19%) had significant CT findings (cardiac, 10; noncardiac, 3) concordant with the final diagnosis. CT failed to suggest a diagnosis in two patients (3%), both of whom proved to have clinically significant coronary artery stenoses. In two patients (3%), CT overdiagnosed a coronary stenosis. Sensitivity and specificity for the establishment of a cardiac cause of chest pain were 83% and 96%, respectively. Overall sensitivity and specificity for all other cardiac and noncardiac causes were 87% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION. ECG-gated MDCT appears to be logistically feasible and shows promise as a comprehensive method for evaluating cardiac and noncardiac chest pain in stable emergency department patients. Further hardware and software improvements will be necessary for adoption of this paradigm in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 540
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Achenbach Stephan, 2003, Cardiology Clinics, V21, P549, DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00090-0
[2]   Prognostic value of predischarge dobutamine stress echocardiography in chest pain patients with a negative cardiac troponin T [J].
Bholasingh, R ;
Cornel, JH ;
Kamp, O ;
van Straalen, JP ;
Sanders, GT ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Umans, VAWM ;
Visser, CA ;
de Winter, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (04) :596-602
[3]   USE OF THE INITIAL ELECTROCARDIOGRAM TO PREDICT IN-HOSPITAL COMPLICATIONS OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
BRUSH, JE ;
BRAND, DA ;
ACAMPORA, D ;
CHALMER, B ;
WACKERS, FJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (18) :1137-1141
[4]   Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: A follow-up study [J].
Georgiou, D ;
Budoff, MJ ;
Kaufer, E ;
Kennedy, JM ;
Lu, B ;
Brundage, BH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (01) :105-110
[5]   A RAPID DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT CENTER FOR PATIENTS WITH CHEST PAIN IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT [J].
GIBLER, WB ;
RUNYON, JP ;
LEVY, RC ;
SAYRE, MR ;
KACICH, R ;
HATTEMER, CR ;
HAMILTON, C ;
GERLACH, JW ;
WALSH, RA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (01) :1-8
[6]   Accuracy of imaging technologies in the diagnosis of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: A meta-analysis [J].
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Salem, D ;
Chew, PW ;
Lau, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 37 (05) :471-477
[7]   Imaging in the evaluation of the patient with suspected acute coronary syndrome [J].
Kontos, MC ;
Tatum, JL .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (04) :246-258
[8]   Detecting acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Kwong, RY ;
Schussheim, AE ;
Rekhraj, S ;
Aletras, AH ;
Geller, N ;
Davis, J ;
Christian, TF ;
Balaban, RS ;
Arai, AE .
CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (04) :531-537
[9]   Diagnosing acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department: A systematic review of the accuracy and clinical effect of current technologies [J].
Lau, J ;
Ioannidis, JPA ;
Balk, EM ;
Milch, C ;
Terrin, N ;
Chew, PW ;
Salem, D .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 37 (05) :453-460
[10]  
Lawler Leo P., 2003, Cardiology Clinics, V21, P607, DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00087-0