Time matters;: what is the time in your defibrillator?: An observational study in 30 emergency medical service systems

被引:9
作者
Castrén, M
Kurola, J
Nurmi, J
Martikainen, M
Vuori, A
Silfvast, T
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Uusimaa EMS, Kauniainen, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Helsinki Area HEMS, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Hosp, Oulu Emergency Med Serv, Dept Anaesthesiol, Oulu, Finland
[6] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Varsinais Suomi Emergency Med Serv, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
关键词
automated external defibrillator (AED); defibrillation; cardiac arrest; emergency medical services; resuscitation; out-of-hospital CPR;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.08.017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Measuring different intervals during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a key element of resuscitation performance. For accurate time measurements, the internal clocks of automated external defibrillator (AEDs) need to be synchronized with the dispatch centre time. Aim: To deter-mine the present practice of using and synchronising the AED clocks in five regions in Finland. Methods: During a single morning, the time of all AED clocks in the emergency medical service (EMS) systems of five large hospital districts were checked and compared with the dispatch centre time. A questionnaire about synchronisation policy and documentation of the first defibrillatory shock was also e-mailed to the local EMS medical supervisors. Results: Eighty-eight AEDs were checked in 30 EMS systems. The mean deviation from dispatch centre time was 412 (+/- 1001) s. There was no difference between EMS systems with (N=7) or without (N=23) written guidelines regarding synchronisation. Many EMSs reported that they document the time of the first shock without synchronisation of clocks. Conclusions: Synchronisation of AED clocks is not widespread in Finland. Instructions to synchronise have been issued in a minority of EMS systems. Despite this, time deviations are large, and erroneous times are recorded. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 295
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
*AM HEART ASS COLL, 2000, RESUSCITATION, V46, P103
[2]   MEASURING THE CALL-RECEIPT-TO-DEFIBRILLATION INTERVAL - EVALUATION OF PREHOSPITAL METHODS [J].
CAMPBELL, JP ;
KROSHUS, KS ;
LINDHOLM, DJ ;
WATSON, WA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 26 (06) :697-701
[3]   Measuring response intervals in a system with a 911 primary and an emergency medical services secondary public safety answering point [J].
Campbell, JP ;
Gridley, TS ;
Muelleman, RL .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 29 (04) :492-496
[4]   RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR UNIFORM REPORTING OF DATA FROM OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST - THE UTSTEIN STYLE [J].
CHAMBERLAIN, D ;
CUMMINS, RO .
RESUSCITATION, 1991, 22 (01) :1-26
[5]  
CORDELL WH, 1994, ANN EMERG MED, V23, P32