On the use of linearized Langmuir equations

被引:252
作者
Bolster, Carl H.
Hornberger, George M.
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Bowling Green, KY 42104 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Environm Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2006.0304
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
One of the most commonly used models for describing solute sorption to soils is the Langmuir model. Because the Langmuir model is nonlinear, fitting the model to sorption data requires that the model be solved iteratively using an optimization program. To avoid the use of optimization programs, a linearized version of the Langmuir model is often used so that model parameters can be obtained by linear regression. Although the linear and nonlinear Langmuir equations are mathematically equivalent, there are several limitations to using linearized Langmuir equations. We examined the limitations of using linearized Langmuir equations by fitting P sorption data collected on eight different soils with four linearized versions of the Langmuir equation and comparing goodness-of-fit measures and fitted parameter values with those obtained with the nonlinear Langmuir equation. We then fit the sorption data with two modified versions of the Langmuir model and assessed whether the fits were statistically superior to the original Langmuir equation. Our results demonstrate that the use of linearized Langmuir equations needlessly limits the ability to model sorption data with good accuracy. To encourage the testing of additional nonlinear sorption models, we have made available an easily used Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (ars.usda.gov/msa/awmru/ bolster/Sorption_spreadsheets) capable of generating best-fit parameters and their standard errors and confidence intervals, correlations between fitted parameters, and goodness-of-fit measures. The results of our study should promote more critical evaluation of model fits to sorption data and encourage the testing of more sophisticated sorption models.
引用
收藏
页码:1796 / 1806
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Adsorption isotherm models for basic dye adsorption by peat in single and binary component systems [J].
Allen, SJ ;
Mckay, G ;
Porter, JF .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2004, 280 (02) :322-333
[2]   Use of general purpose adsorption isotherms for heavy metal clay mineral interactions [J].
Altin, O ;
Ozbelge, HO ;
Dogu, T .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1998, 198 (01) :130-140
[3]   COMPARISON OF 7 METHODS FOR FITTING MICHAELIS-MENTEN EQUATION [J].
ATKINS, GL ;
NIMMO, IA .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1975, 149 (03) :775-777
[5]   IDENTIFICATION OF PARAMETERS IN UNSTEADY OPEN CHANNEL FLOWS [J].
BECKER, L ;
YEH, WWG .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1972, 8 (04) :956-&
[6]   Effect of surface coatings, grain size, and ionic strength on the maximum attainable coverage of bacteria on sand surfaces [J].
Bolster, CH ;
Mills, AL ;
Hornberger, GM ;
Herman, JS .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 2001, 50 (3-4) :287-305
[7]   Phosphorus sorption in relation to soil properties in some cultivated Swedish soils [J].
Börling, K ;
Otabbong, E ;
Barberis, E .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 59 (01) :39-46
[8]   EVALUATION OF PARAMETER-ESTIMATION METHODS FOR ESTIMATING CELLULASE BINDING CONSTANTS [J].
BOTHWELL, MK ;
WALKER, LP .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 53 (01) :21-29
[9]  
Breeuwsma A., 1995, ANIMAL WASTE LAND WA, P239
[10]  
Burnham K.P., 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2917-7_3