Follow-up after intensive care:: a single center study

被引:56
作者
Kvåle, R [1 ]
Ulvik, A [1 ]
Flaatten, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Haukeland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
关键词
intensive care; follow-up studies; patient outcome assessment; quality of life; health status; memory;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-003-2034-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives. To study health problems, quality of life, functional status, and memory after intensive care. Setting. Adult patients (n=346) discharged from a university hospital ICU. Design and methods. Prospective cohort study. Follow-up patients were found using the ICU database and the Peoples Registry. Quality of life (QOL) was measured with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) 6 months after ICU discharge. Semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, Glasgow Outcome Score (recovery), and Karnofsky Index (functional status) were used at consultations 7-8 months after ICU discharge. Results. The SF-36 response rate was 64.5%, with scores significantly lower than population scores. Consultation patients (n=136) did not differ from the rest (n=210) regarding age, SAPS II scores, length of stay (LOS), and reasons for ICU admission. At follow-up 67.6% of consultation patients continued most activities, 75% looked after themselves, and 64.7% were non-workers, compared to 40.4% before the ICU admission. During and after the ICU stay, 40% lost more than 10 kg body weight. Fifty-eight (43%) could not remember anything from their ICU stay. At follow-up only 22 (16%) could remember having received information during their ICU stay. Three patients needed referral to other specialities. Conclusions. We should focus more on optimizing symptom management and giving repeated information after ICU discharge. Nutritional status and weight loss is another area of concern. More research is needed to find out how the broad range of psychosocial and physical problems following an ICU stay relates to the stay.
引用
收藏
页码:2149 / 2156
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Use of a personal diary written on the ICU during critical illness [J].
Bäckman, CG ;
Walther, SM .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (02) :426-429
[2]   Review of outcome measures used in adult critical care [J].
Black, NA ;
Jenkinson, C ;
Hayes, JA ;
Young, D ;
Vella, K ;
Rowan, KM ;
Daly, K ;
Ridley, S .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (11) :2119-2124
[3]   VALIDATING THE SF-36 HEALTH SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE - NEW OUTCOME MEASURE FOR PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRAZIER, JE ;
HARPER, R ;
JONES, NMB ;
OCATHAIN, A ;
THOMAS, KJ ;
USHERWOOD, T ;
WESTLAKE, L .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846) :160-164
[4]   Quality of life outcomes after intensive care - Comparison with a community group [J].
Brooks, R ;
Kerridge, R ;
Hillman, K ;
Bauman, A ;
Daffurn, K .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (05) :581-586
[5]   Clinical review: Intensive care follow-up - what has it told us? [J].
Broomhead, LR ;
Brett, SJ .
CRITICAL CARE, 2002, 6 (05) :411-417
[6]  
Chaboyer Wendy, 2002, Aust Crit Care, V15, P21, DOI 10.1016/S1036-7314(02)80040-6
[7]   Short Form 36 in the intensive care unit: Assessment of acceptability, reliability and validity of the questionnaire [J].
Chrispin, PS ;
Scotton, H ;
Rogers, J ;
Lloyd, D ;
Ridley, SA .
ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (01) :15-23
[8]  
DRAGSTED L, 1990, EUR J ANAESTH, V7, P51
[9]   Survival, morbidity, and quality of life after discharge from intensive care [J].
Eddleston, JM ;
White, P ;
Guthrie, E .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (07) :2293-2299
[10]   Survival and quality of life 12 years after ICU.: A comparison with the general Norwegian population [J].
Flaatten, H ;
Kvåle, R .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (06) :1005-1011