Nonmonotonic dose-response relationships: Mechanistic basis, kinetic modeling, and implications for risk assessment

被引:178
作者
Conolly, RB
Lutz, WK
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Toxicol, D-97078 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] CIIT Ctr Hlth Res, Ctr Hlth Res, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
dose-response relationship; hormesis; mechanisms; models;
D O I
10.1093/toxsci/kfh007
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Dose-response curves for the first interaction of a chemical with a biochemical target molecule are usually monotonic; i.e., they increase or decrease over the entire dose range. However, for reactions of a complex biological system to a toxicant, nonmonotonic (biphasic) dose-effect relationships can be observed, showing a decrease at low dose followed by an increase at high dose, or vice versa. We present four examples to demonstrate that nonmonotonic dose-response relationships can result from superimposition of monotonic dose responses of component biological reactions. Examples include (i) a membrane-receptor model with receptor subtypes of different ligand affinity and opposing downstream effects (adenosine receptors A1 vs. A2), (ii) androgen receptor-mediated gene expression driven by homodimers, but not mixed-ligand dimers, (iii) repair of background DNA damage by enzymatic activity induced by adducts formed by a xenobiotic, (iv) rate of mutation as a consequence of DNA damage times rate of cell division, the latter being modulated by cell-cycle delay at low-level DNA damage, and cell-cycle acceleration due to regenerative hyperplasia at cytotoxic dose levels. Quantitative analyses based on biological models are shown, and factors that affect the degree of nonmonotonicity are identified. It is noted that threshold-type dose-response curves could in fact be nonmonotonic. Our analysis should promote a scientific discussion of biphasic dose responses and the concept termed "hormesis," and of default procedures for low-dose extrapolation in toxicological risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 157
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Federal Register
[2]   EFFICIENCY OF THE ADAPTIVE RESPONSE OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI TO ALKYLATING-AGENTS [J].
CAIRNS, J .
NATURE, 1980, 286 (5769) :176-178
[3]  
Calabrese E.J., 2001, CRIT REV TOXICOL, V31, P4
[4]   Toxicology rethinks its central belief - Hormesis demands a reappraisal of the way risks are assessed. [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
NATURE, 2003, 421 (6924) :691-692
[5]   Hormesis: The dose-response revolution [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 2003, 43 :175-197
[6]   The hormetic dose-response model is more common than the threshold model in toxicology [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 71 (02) :246-250
[7]   Hormesis: A generalizable and unifying hypothesis [J].
Calabrese, EJ ;
Baldwin, LA .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 31 (4-5) :353-424
[8]   CELL-PROLIFERATION IN CARCINOGENESIS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
ELLWEIN, LB .
SCIENCE, 1990, 249 (4972) :1007-1011
[9]   Dose response for formaldehyde-induced cytotoxicity in the human respiratory tract [J].
Conolly, RB ;
Kimbell, JS ;
Janszen, DB ;
Miller, FJ .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 35 (01) :32-43
[10]  
CRUMP KS, 1976, CANCER RES, V36, P2973