Comparison of recirculation configurations for biological nutrient removal in a membrane bioreactor

被引:32
作者
Ersu, Cagatayhan Bekir [2 ]
Ong, Say Kee [1 ]
Arslankaya, Ertan [3 ]
Brown, Patrick [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Cukurova Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Adana, Turkey
[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
membrane bioreactor (MBR); denitrification; phosphorus uptake; recirculation;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2007.10.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 [工学]; 0830 [环境科学与工程];
摘要
A 12-L lab-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR), consisting of an anaerobic and anoxic compartment followed by an oxic plate-frame membrane compartment, was evaluated for carbonaceous and nutrient removals by varying the recirculation of mixed liquor and permeate. The hydraulic retention times (HRTs) for the anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic compartments were 2, 2, and 8 h, respectively. The solids residence time (SRT) for the oxic compartment was 25 days. Five different recirculation configurations were tested by recirculating mixed liquor and/or permeate recirculation equal to the influent flow rate (identified as 100%) into different locations of the anaerobic and anoxic compartments. Of the five configurations, the configuration with 100% mixed liquor recirculation to the anaerobic compartment and 100% permeate recirculation to the anoxic compartment gave the highest percentage removal with an average 92.3 +/- 0.5% soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD), 75.6 +/- 0.4% total nitrogen (TN), and 62.4 +/- 1.3% total phosphorus (TP) removal. When the mixed liquor and permeate recirculation rates were varied for the same configuration, the highest TP removal was obtained for 300% mixed liquor recirculation and 100% permeate recirculation (300%/100%) with a TP removal of 88.1 +/- 1.3% while the highest TN removal (90.3 +/- 0.3%) was obtained for 200%/300% recirculation. TN and TP concentrations as low as 4.2 +/- 0.1 and 1.4 +/- 0.2 mg/L respectively were obtained. Mass loading rates were generally low in the range of 0.11-0.22kgCOD/ kg MLSS/d due to high biomass concentrations within the oxic reactor (approx. 8000 mg/L). The BioWinc (R) model was calibrated against one set of the experimental data and was found to predict the experimental data of effluent TN, TP, and NO3--N but over-predicted sCOD and NH3-N for various recirculation rates. The anoxic heterotrophic yield for the calibrated model was 0.2kg biomass COD/kg COD utilized while the maximum growth rates were found to be 0.45 day(-1) for mu(max-autotroph), 3.2 day(-1) for mu(max-heterotroph), and 1.5 day(-1) for mu(max-PAO). (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1651 / 1663
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Membrane bioreactor configurations for enhanced biological phosphorus removal [J].
Adam, C ;
Kraume, M ;
Gnirss, R ;
Lesjean, B .
MEMBRANES IN DRINKING AND INDUSTRIAL WATER PRODUCTION III, 2003, :237-244
[2]
APHA/AWWA/WEF , 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[3]
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR ON DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER TREATMENT SLUDGE PRODUCTION AND MODELING APPROACH [J].
CHAIZE, S ;
HUYARD, A .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 23 (7-9) :1591-1600
[4]
HOUSEHOLD MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR IN DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER TREATMENT [J].
CHIEMCHAISRI, C ;
YAMAMOTO, K ;
VIGNESWARAN, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (01) :171-178
[5]
CRAWFORD G, 2000, CD ROM P WEFTEC 73 A
[6]
Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor [J].
Huang, X ;
Gui, P ;
Qian, Y .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 36 (10) :1001-1006
[7]
DISINFECTION AND CLARIFICATION OF TREATED SEWAGE BY ADVANCED MICROFILTRATION [J].
KOLEGA, M ;
GROHMANN, GS ;
CHIEW, RF ;
DAY, AW .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 23 (7-9) :1609-1618
[8]
TEST ON MICROFILTRATION AS A TERTIARY-TREATMENT DOWNSTREAM OF FIXED BACTERIA FILTRATION [J].
LANGLAIS, B ;
DENIS, P ;
TRIBALLEAU, S ;
FAIVRE, M ;
BOURBIGOT, MM .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 25 (10) :219-230
[9]
Biological kinetic data evaluation of an activated sludge system coupled with an ultrafiltration membrane [J].
Macomber, J ;
Cicek, N ;
Suidan, MT ;
Davel, J ;
Ginestet, P ;
Audic, JM .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 131 (04) :579-586
[10]
Metcalf L., 1991, Wastewater Engineering-Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, V4