Influence of antisperm antibodies on the acrosome reaction as determined by flow cytometry

被引:20
作者
Bohring, C
Skrzypek, J
Krause, W
机构
[1] Department of Andrology, Clinical Training Center, Dermatology of the Philipps-University, Marburg
[2] Department of Andrology, D-35033 Marburg
关键词
antisperm antibodies; acrosome reaction; donor spermatozoa; flow cytometry; monoclonal antibody TUS 19;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01924-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the influence of antisperm antibodies on the acrosome, reaction (AR). Design: Clinical study. Setting: University of Marburg, Department of Andrology, Clinical Training Center of the European Academy of Andrology. Patient(s): Spermatozoa from a pool of healthy donors were incubated with 30 seminal plasma samples from infertile men containing antisperm antibodies; they were compared to a control group of 10 samples without antisperm antibodies and five samples with buffer only. Intervention(s): The spontaneous acrosome reaction (SAR) and the induced acrosome reaction (JAR) by calcium ionophore A23187 were observed and determined by means of a flow cytometer. Flow cytometric double-staining estimates of acrosomal integrity were determined by using a monoclonal antibody (TUS 19), marked with a secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled antibody. Cell viability was determined by counterstaining with propidium iodide (PI). Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of acrosome reacted spermatozoa. Result(s): The spermatozoa treated with antisperm antibodies showed significantly higher SAR and JAR responses than the control group. Conclusion(s): Some of the antisperm antibodies from individual patients are able to enhance the acrosome reaction in donor sperm, but none of them appeared to inhibit acrosome reaction. (C) 2001 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BANDOH R, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V57, P387
[2]  
Barratt CLR, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P1463
[3]   The intra- and inter-assay variation of the indirect mixed antiglobulin reaction test: is a quality control suitable? [J].
Bohring, C ;
Krause, W .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (07) :1802-1805
[4]   EVALUATION OF THE ACROSOME REACTION USING MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES AGAINST DIFFERENT ACROSOMAL ANTIGENS - COMPARISON WITH THE TRIPLE STAIN TECHNIQUE [J].
BRAUN, J ;
HIRSCH, T ;
KRAUSE, W ;
ZIEGLER, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 1991, 14 (06) :431-436
[5]   PROGESTERONE-INDUCED ACROSOME REACTION - POTENTIAL ROLE FOR SPERM ACROSOME ANTIGEN-1 IN FERTILIZATION [J].
BRUCKER, C ;
KASSNER, G ;
LOSER, C ;
HINRICHSEN, M ;
LIPFORD, GB .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1994, 9 (10) :1897-1902
[6]  
CUMMINS JM, 1991, J ANDROL, V12, P98
[7]   Fluorescence-labeled fucolectins are superior markers for flow cytometric quantitation of the human sperm acrosome reaction [J].
DCruz, OJ ;
Haas, GG .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (04) :843-851
[8]  
FENICHEL P, 1989, J REPROD FERTIL, V87, P699
[9]   Interference of antisperm antibodies with the induction of the acrosome reaction by zona pellucida (ZP) and its relationship with the inhibition of ZP binding [J].
Francavilla, F ;
Romano, R ;
Santucci, R ;
Marrone, V ;
Properzi, G ;
Ruvolo, G .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (06) :1128-1133
[10]  
Grundy CE, 1998, INT J ANDROL, V21, P261