Relation between hospital primary angioplasty volume and mortality for patients with acute MI treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy

被引:209
作者
Magid, DJ
Calonge, BN
Rumsfeld, JS
Canto, JG
Frederick, PD
Every, NR
Barron, HV
机构
[1] Colorado Permanente Med Grp, Clin Res Unit, Denver, CO 80231 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Prevent Med & Biometr, Div Emergency Med, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Family Med, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Cardiol, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Med Ctr, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[6] Denver VA Med Ctr, Denver, CO 80220 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[10] Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 284卷 / 24期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.284.24.3131
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context institutional experience with primary angioplasty has been suggested as a factor in selecting a reperfusion strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, no large studies have directly compared outcomes of primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy as a function of institutional experience. Objective To compare outcomes among patients with AMI who were treated with primary angioplasty vs thrombolytic therapy at hospitals with different volumes of primary angioplasty. Design Retrospective cohort. Setting A total of 446 acute care hospitals with 112 classified as low volume (less than or equal to 16 procedures), 223 as intermediate volume (17-48 procedures), and 111 as high volume (greater than or equal to 49 procedures) based on their annual primary angioplasty volume. Patients A total of 62 299 patients with AMI treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy from June 1, 1994, through July 31, 1999. Main Outcome Measure In-hospital mortality, Results Mortality was lower among patients who received primary angioplasty compared with those who received thrombolysis at hospitals with intermediate volumes (4.5% vs 5.9%; P<.001) and high volumes (3.4% vs 5.4%; P<.001) of primary angioplasty. At low-volume hospitals, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with primary angioplasty vs those treated with thrombolysis (6.2% vs 5.9%; P=.58). Adjusting for differences in demographic, medical history, clinical presentation, treatment, and hospital characteristics did not significantly alter these findings. Conclusions in this study, patients with AMI treated at hospitals with high or intermediate volumes of primary angioplasty had lower mortality with primary angioplasty than with thrombolysis, whereas patients with AMI treated at hospitals with low angioplasty volumes had similar mortality outcomes with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis.
引用
收藏
页码:3131 / 3138
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1988, LANCET, V2, P349
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1986, LANCET, V1, P397
  • [3] INDICATIONS FOR FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY IN SUSPECTED ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - COLLABORATIVE OVERVIEW OF EARLY MORTALITY AND MAJOR MORBIDITY RESULTS FROM ALL RANDOMIZED TRIALS OF MORE THAN 1000 PATIENTS
    APPLEBY, P
    BAIGENT, C
    COLLINS, R
    FLATHER, M
    PARISH, S
    PETO, R
    BELL, P
    HALLS, H
    MEAD, G
    DIAZ, R
    PAOLASSO, E
    PAVIOTTI, C
    ROMERO, G
    CAMPBELL, T
    OROURKE, MF
    THOMPSON, P
    LESAFFRE, E
    VANDEWERF, F
    VERSTRAETE, M
    ARMSTRONG, PW
    CAIRNS, JA
    MORAN, C
    TURPIE, AG
    YUSUF, S
    GRANDE, P
    HEIKKILA, J
    KALA, R
    BASSAND, JP
    BOISSEL, JP
    BROCHIER, M
    LEIZOROVICZ, A
    BRUGGEMANN, T
    KARSCH, KR
    KASPER, W
    LAMMERTS, D
    NEUHAUS, KL
    MEYER, J
    SCHRODER, R
    VONESSEN, R
    SARAN, RK
    ARDISSINO, D
    BONADUCE, D
    BRUNELLI, C
    CERNIGLIARO, C
    FORESTI, A
    FRANZOSI, MG
    GUIDUCCI, D
    MAGGIONI, A
    MAGNANI, B
    MATTIOLI, G
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 343 (8893) : 311 - 322
  • [4] Use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction in the United States - Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2
    Barron, HV
    Bowlby, LJ
    Breen, T
    Rogers, WJ
    Canto, JG
    Zhang, YA
    Tiefenbrunn, AJ
    Weaver, WD
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1998, 97 (12) : 1150 - 1156
  • [5] Betriu A, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P1621
  • [6] PLACING TRIALS IN CONTEXT USING BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS - GUSTO REVISITED BY REVEREND BAYES
    BROPHY, JM
    JOSEPH, L
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (11): : 871 - 875
  • [7] The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction
    Canto, JG
    Every, NR
    Magid, DJ
    Rogers, WJ
    Malmgren, JA
    Frederick, PD
    French, WJ
    Tiefenbrunn, AJ
    Misra, VK
    Kiefe, CI
    Barron, HV
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (21) : 1573 - 1580
  • [8] Treatment of acute myocardial infarction by primary coronary angioplasty or intravenous thrombolysis in the "real world" -: One-year results from a nationwide French survey
    Danchin, N
    Vaur, L
    Genès, N
    Etienne, S
    Angioï, M
    Ferrières, J
    Cambou, JP
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (20) : 2639 - 2644
  • [9] A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction
    Every, NR
    Parsons, LS
    Hlatky, M
    Martin, JS
    Weaver, WD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (17) : 1253 - 1260
  • [10] A comparison of the national registry of myocardial infarction 2 with the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project
    Every, NR
    Frederick, PD
    Robinson, M
    Sugarman, J
    Bowlby, L
    Barron, HV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 33 (07) : 1886 - 1894