Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation After Conventional Discectomy A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Full-endoscopic Interlaminar and Transforaminal Versus Microsurgical Revision

被引:217
作者
Ruetten, Sebastian [1 ]
Komp, Martin [1 ]
Merk, Harry [2 ]
Godolias, Georgios
机构
[1] Univ Witten Herdecke, Ctr Orthopaed & Traumatol, Dept Spine Surg & Pain Therapy, St Anna Hosp Herne, D-44649 Herne, Germany
[2] Ernst Moritz Arndt Univ Greifswald, Clin Orthopaed & Orthopaed Surg, Greifswald, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2009年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
recurrent lumbar disc herniation; disc herniation; lumbar discectomy; endoscopic discectomy; endoscopic nucleotomy; minimally invasive spine surgery; BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; SPINAL STABILITY; GRADED FACETECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE; EPIDURAL FIBROSIS; TERM OUTCOMES; FACET JOINTS; STENOSIS; MICRODISCECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e318175ddb4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniations after conventional discectomy, operated either in a full-endoscopic or microsurgical technique. Objective: Comparison of results of lumbar revision discectomies in full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal technique with the conventional microsurgical technique. Summary of Background Data: Recurrences after lumbar disc operations cannot be prevented. Because of the existing scarring, the risk of intraoperative complications may be increased and consecutive damage may arise owing to greater traumatization. In disc surgery, tissue-sparing interventions are becoming more widespread. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and postoperatively. With the transforaminal and interlaminar techniques, 2 full-endoscopic procedures are available for the lumbar spine. Methods: Eighty-seven patients with recurrent herniation after conventional discectomy underwent full-endoscopic or microsurgical intervention and were followed for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: visual analog scale, German version of the North American Spine Society Instrument, Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Results: Postoperatively, 79% of the patients no longer had leg pain, and 16% had occasional pain. The clinical results were the same in both groups. The re-recurrence rate was 5.7% with no difference between the groups. The full-endoscopic techniques brought significant advantages in the following areas: rehabilitation, complications, and traumatization. Conclusions: The clinical results of the full-endoscopic technique are equal to those of the microsurgical technique. At the same time, there are advantages in the operation technique and reduced traumatization. With the surgical devices and the possibility of selecting an interlaminar or posterolateral to lateral transforaminal procedure, recurrent lumbar disc herniations can be sufficiently removed using the full-endoscopic technique. Full-endoscopic surgery is a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to microsurgical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 129
页数:8
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]
BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF LUMBAR SPINAL STABILITY AFTER GRADED FACETECTOMIES [J].
ABUMI, K ;
PANJABI, MM ;
KRAMER, KM ;
DURANCEAU, J ;
OXLAND, T ;
CRISCO, JJ .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (11) :1142-1147
[2]
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and prognostic factors of 43 consecutive cases [J].
Ahn, Y ;
Lee, SH ;
Park, WM ;
Lee, HY ;
Shin, SW ;
Kang, HY .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (16) :E326-E332
[3]
Andersson GBJ, 1996, SPINE, V21, pS75, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199612151-00009
[4]
NO RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EPIDURAL FIBROSIS AND SCIATICA IN THE LUMBAR POSTDISKECTOMY SYNDROME - A STUDY WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN SYMPTOMATIC AND ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS [J].
ANNERTZ, M ;
JONSSON, B ;
STROMQVIST, B ;
HOLTAS, S .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (04) :449-453
[5]
[Anonymous], N ENGL J MED
[6]
BOYER P, 1994, NEUROCHIRURGIE, V40, P259
[7]
Posterior endoscopic discectomy (and other procedures) [J].
Brayda-Bruno, M ;
Cinnella, P .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (Suppl 1) :S24-S29
[8]
A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy:: Short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect [J].
Carragee, EJ ;
Spinnickie, AO ;
Alamin, TF ;
Paragioudakis, S .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) :653-657
[9]
Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: The effects of fragment type and anular competence [J].
Carragee, EJ ;
Han, MY ;
Suen, PW ;
Kim, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (01) :102-108
[10]
THE CASPAR MICROSURGICAL DISCECTOMY AND COMPARISON WITH A CONVENTIONAL STANDARD LUMBAR-DISK PROCEDURE [J].
CASPAR, W ;
CAMPBELL, B ;
BARBIER, DD ;
KRETSCHMMER, R ;
GOTFRIED, Y .
NEUROSURGERY, 1991, 28 (01) :78-87