Primary gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progression in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer - A multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy

被引:66
作者
Herman, CM
Kattan, MW
Ohori, M
Scardino, PT
Wheeler, TM
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Methodist Hosp, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Methodist Hosp, Scott Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
关键词
prostate; adenocarcinoma; Gleason; pathologic grade;
D O I
10.1097/00000478-200105000-00014
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Gleason score (GS) is a powerful predictor of disease progression in men with prostate cancer (PCa). The majority of clinically localized prostate cancers, however, are moderately (GS5/6) or moderate to poorly (GS7) differentiated tumors with indeterminate prognosis. Differences in disease progression between patients with GS5/6 and GS7 tumors suggest the presence of any component of high-grade tumor (Gleason pattern [GP] 4/5) worsens prognosis markedly. Indeed, McNeal er al. have shown that quantification of GP4/5 provides prognostic information beyond the standard CS. Few investigators have analyzed whether primary and secondary GPs are important prognostically within GS7 PCa. AH 823 whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens with GS7 from a single surgeon (P.T.S.) were analyzed. Tumors were either 3+4 or 4+3, and primary GP was assigned by the same pathologist (T.M.W.). A total of 643 patients with 3+4 tumors and 180 patients with 4+3 tumors were studied. Statistical analysis using the log-rank test showed a significant difference in recurrence-free survival between patients with primary GP4 and those with GP3 (p <0.0001). However, in multivariate analysis with preoperative prostate-specific antigen, total tumor volume, surgical margin status, and the presence or absence of seminal vesicle involvement, extraprostatic extension, and lymph node metastasis, the primary GP did not retain independent significance (p = 0.0557). GS7 PCa is a heterogeneous group of tumors. In this cohort of men with GS7 tumors treated by radical retropubic prostatectomy, primary GP showed a significant correlation with other histologic and clinical predictors of disease progression: however, it was not independently predictive of disease progression in multivariate analysis (p = 0.76).
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 660
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UROLOGIC PATHOLOGY
[2]   Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy [J].
Chan, TY ;
Partin, AW ;
Walsh, PC ;
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (05) :823-827
[3]   Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy - A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Partin, AW ;
Sauvageot, J ;
Walsh, PC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 20 (03) :286-292
[4]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[5]  
Herman C. M., 1999, Modern Pathology, V12, p97A
[6]   Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1499-1507
[7]  
MCNEAL JE, 1986, LANCET, V1, P60
[8]  
MCNEAL JE, 1990, CANCER, V66, P1225, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19900915)66:6<1225::AID-CNCR2820660624>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-X
[10]   HISTOLOGY AND PROGNOSIS OF PROSTATIC CANCER [J].
MELLINGER, GT ;
GLEASON, D ;
BAILAR, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1967, 97 (02) :331-+