Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the critically ill elderly

被引:193
作者
Litt, B
Wityk, RJ
Hertz, SH
Mullen, PD
Weiss, H
Ryan, DD
Henry, TR
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Neurol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Sinai Hosp, Dept Med, Div Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
critical illness; elderly; nonconvulsive status epilepticus; electroencephalography; outcome;
D O I
10.1111/j.1528-1157.1998.tb01311.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To describe the electrographic and clinical features of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) in the critically ill elderly and to identify potential predictors of outcome. Methods: We prospectively identified 25 episodes of altered mentation and NCSE in 24 critically ill elderly patients associated with generalized, focal, or bihemispheric epileptiform EEG patterns. Patients with anoxic encephalopathy were excluded. Results: Of 25 hospitalizations, 13 (52%) resulted in death, and 12 (48%) patients survived to discharge. Death was associated with the number of acute, life-threatening medical problems on presentation (survivors, 1.8; fatalities, 2.8; p = 0.013) and with generalized EEG pattern (p = 0.017). Higher doses or greater number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) did not improve outcome. Treatment with intravenous benzodiazepines was associated with increased risk of death (p = 0.033). Ten patients with advance directives were managed outside the intensive care unit (ICU). Mean hospitalization was 39 days in the ICU group and 22 for those with advance directives (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Severity of illness correlates with mortality in critically ill elderly patients with NCSE. Treatment with intravenous benzodiazepines may increase their risk of death. Aggressive ICU management may prolong hospitalization at considerable cost, without improving outcome. It is unclear whether NCSE affects outcome in the critically ill elderly or is merely a marker for severity of disease in predisposed patients. The benefits of aggressive therapy are unclear. Carefully controlled, prospective trials will be necessary to determine the best therapies for NCSE in the critically ill elderly and the appropriate role of the ICU in their management.
引用
收藏
页码:1194 / 1202
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   ABSENCE STATUS - REAPPRAISAL FOLLOWING REVIEW OF 38 PATIENTS [J].
ANDERMANN, F ;
ROBB, JP .
EPILEPSIA, 1972, 13 (01) :177-+
[2]  
BALLENGER CE, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1545
[3]  
CASCINO G, 1993, EPILEPSIA S1, V34, P21
[4]   CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF GENERALIZED ELECTROGRAPHIC STATUS EPILEPTICUS [J].
DRISLANE, FW ;
SCHOMER, DL .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 1994, 19 (02) :111-121
[5]   ACUTE PROLONGED CONFUSION IN LATER LIFE AS AN ICTAL STATE [J].
ELLIS, JM ;
LEE, SI .
EPILEPSIA, 1978, 19 (02) :119-128
[6]  
GASTAUT H, 1983, STATUS EPILEPTICUS, P61
[7]   NONCONVULSIVE STATUS EPILEPTICUS - EEG-ANALYSIS IN A LARGE SERIES [J].
GRANNER, MA ;
LEE, SI .
EPILEPSIA, 1994, 35 (01) :42-47
[8]   NONCONVULSIVE GENERALIZED STATUS EPILEPTICUS - CLINICAL-FEATURES, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING, AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
GUBERMAN, A ;
CANTUREYNA, G ;
STUSS, D ;
BROUGHTON, R .
NEUROLOGY, 1986, 36 (10) :1284-1291
[9]  
Kaplan Peter W., 1994, Epilepsia, V35, P9
[10]   Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in the emergency room [J].
Kaplan, PW .
EPILEPSIA, 1996, 37 (07) :643-650