Montelukast as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of mild to moderate asthma: a systematic review

被引:101
作者
Joos, S. [1 ]
Miksch, A. [1 ]
Szecsenyi, J. [1 ]
Wieseler, B. [2 ]
Grouven, U. [2 ]
Kaiser, T. [2 ]
Schneider, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Gen Practice & Hlth Serv Res, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] IQWIG, Inst Qual & Efficiency Hlth Care, Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1136/thx.2007.081596
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To systematically review the evidence for the medium to long term benefits and risks of montelukast as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in comparison with placebo and active controls in mild to moderate asthma. Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists of retrieved articles, clinical trial registries and study results databases. Review methods: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials (duration >= 12 weeks) in adolescents and adults comparing montelukast/ICS versus ICS monotherapy or montelukast/ICS versus active control/ICS. Metaanalyses were conducted where feasible. The main focus was on clinical outcomes (eg, exacerbations). Adverse events were also assessed. Results: 13 studies meeting all of the inclusion criteria were identified: 7 studies, including constant or tapered doses of ICS, compared montelukast/ICS with ICS monotherapy. Six studies compared add-on montelukast with an add-on active control (salmeterol). Overall, the data indicated that montelukast/ICS was clinically more effective than ICS monotherapy. The ICS sparing potential of montelukast was clearly demonstrated in one study. Montelukast/ICS and ICS monotherapy showed similar safety profiles. In the active controlled studies, montelukast/ ICS was clinically less effective than salmeterol/ICS in the 12 week trials ( pooled proportion of patients with >= 1 exacerbation: p= 0.006). However, separate analysis of active controlled 48 week trials showed comparable proportions for patients with >= 1 exacerbation in both groups. Conclusions: Montelukast as add-on therapy to ICS improves control of mild to moderate asthma compared with ICS monotherapy. Although the addition of salmeterol to ICS is clinically as effective as or even more effective than the addition of montelukast, montelukast may have a better long term safety profile and offer a treatment alternative for asthma patients.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 462
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Adams N, 2005, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD002310.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD003135.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD003534.pub2]
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOB IN ASTHM GLOB S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470693926
[4]  
*AZQ, NAT VERS ASTHM NAT G
[5]   Montelukast and fluticasone compared with salmeterol and fluticasone in protecting against asthma exacerbation in adults: one year, double blind, randomised, comparative trial [J].
Bjermer, L ;
Bisgaard, H ;
Bousquet, J ;
Fabbri, LM ;
Greening, AP ;
Haahtela, T ;
Holgate, ST ;
Picado, C ;
Menten, J ;
Dass, SB ;
Leff, JA ;
Polos, PG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7420) :891-895
[6]   Daily versus as-needed corticosteroids for mild persistent asthma [J].
Boushey, HA ;
Sorkness, CA ;
King, TS ;
Sullivan, SD ;
Fahy, JV ;
Lazarus, SC ;
Chinchilli, VM ;
Craig, TJ ;
Dimango, EA ;
Deykin, A ;
Fagan, JK ;
Fish, JE ;
Ford, JG ;
Kraft, M ;
Lemanske, RF ;
Leone, FT ;
Martin, RJ ;
Mauger, EA ;
Pesola, GR ;
Peters, SP ;
Rollings, NJ ;
Szefler, SJ ;
Wechsler, ME ;
Israel, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (15) :1519-1528
[7]  
*BRIT THOR SOC, BTS SIGN 2004 UPD BR
[8]   Bronchoprotective effects of leukotriene receptor antagonists in asthma - A meta-analysis [J].
Currie, GP ;
Lipworth, BJ .
CHEST, 2002, 122 (01) :146-150
[9]   Treatment of asthma with drugs modifying the leukotriene pathway [J].
Drazen, JM ;
Israel, E ;
O'Byrne, PM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (03) :197-206
[10]   Anti-leukotrienes as add-on therapy to inhaled glucocorticoids in patients with asthma: systematic review of current evidence [J].
Ducharme, FM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7353) :1545-1548A