A Systematic Approach to Institutional Analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom's Grammar

被引:88
作者
Basurto, Xavier [1 ,2 ]
Kingsley, Gordon [3 ]
McQueen, Kelly
Smith, Mshadoni
Weible, Christopher M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Sch Publ Affairs, Denver, CO USA
关键词
grammar of institutions; institutional statements; rules; norms; institutional analysis and development framework; IAD;
D O I
10.1177/1065912909334430
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In 1995, Crawford and Ostrom proposed a grammatical syntax for examining institutional statements (i.e., rules, norms, and strategies) as part of the institutional analysis and development framework. This article constitutes the first attempt at applying the grammatical syntax to code institutional statements using two pieces of U.S. legislation. The authors illustrate how the grammatical syntax can serve as a basis for collecting, presenting, and analyzing data in a way that is reliable and conveys valid and substantive meaning for the researcher. The article concludes by describing some implementation challenges and ideas for future theoretical and field research.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 537
页数:15
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, UNDERSTANDING I DIVE, DOI DOI 10.2307/2082975
[3]  
Babbie E.R., 2012, PRACTICE SOCIAL RES
[4]  
Baumgartner Frank R., 1993, AGENDAS INSTABILITY
[5]  
BERRY FS, 2007, THEORIES POLICY PROC, P21
[6]   A GRAMMAR OF INSTITUTIONS [J].
CRAWFORD, SES ;
OSTROM, E .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1995, 89 (03) :582-600
[7]  
Koestler A., 1973, UNITY DIVERSITY FEST, P287
[8]  
Ostrom E, 2005, UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY, P1
[9]  
Ostrom Elinor., 2007, THEORIES POLICY PROC, P21
[10]  
SCHLUTER A, 2008, C SER WORKSH POL THE