Endogenous androgen levels and cardiovascular risk profile in women across the adult life span

被引:60
作者
Bell, Robin J.
Davison, Sonia L.
Papalia, Mary-Anne
McKenzie, Dean P.
Davis, Susan R.
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Monash Med Sch, Womens Hlth Program,Dept Med,Cent & Eastern Clin, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Jean Hailes Fdn, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Biochem, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Alfred Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Cent & Eastern Clin Sch, Prahran, Vic, Australia
来源
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY | 2007年 / 14卷 / 04期
关键词
testosterone; cardiovascular disease; lipids;
D O I
10.1097/gme.0b013e31802b6cb1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Whether endogenous androgen levels contribute to the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile in women is controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate systematically the relationships between serum levels of endogenous androgens and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and biochemical CVD risk profile, taking other known risk factors into account. Design: This community-based cross-sectional study included 587 non-healthcare-seeking-women, aged 18 to 75 years, who were randomly recruited from the community via the electoral roll from April 2002 to August 2003. Participants were euthyroid; had no usage of exogenous steroids; had no history of tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy; and did not have hyperprolactinemia or polycystic ovarian syndrome. The relationships between total testosterone, SHBG, free testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and androstenedione and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) and lipids were explored using linear regression with natural logarithm (in) -or square root-transformed data as indicated. Issues of nonlinearity and interaction were addressed by the inclusion of extra regression terms where appropriate. We determined the change in the proportion of variation for each marker of the CVD risk profile explained by the addition of each harmone term to the models, having adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, and exercise. Results: Menopausal status did not influence the statistical models for high-sensitivity CRP and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, but for both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, the proportion of variation explained by the models was substantially less in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women. Almost all of the highly statistically significant findings were related to the addition of the SHBG terms to the models. The changes in r(2) values were highly statistically significant for the addition of the SHBG terms to the models for In CRP and In high-density lipoprotein for both pre- and postmenopausal women (P <= 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively) and for In triglycerides in postmenopausal (P < 0.001) and premenopausal women (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Endogenous testosterone and the adrenal preandrogens per se are not significant independent determinants of circulating high-sensitivity CRP or lipoprotein lipids. Our analyses provide further support for the independent predictive value of low SHBG levels for CVD risk profile and an independent contribution of the menopausal transition to the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 638
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Sex hormone-binding globulin is a major determinant of the lipid profile:: the PRIME study [J].
Bataille, V ;
Perret, B ;
Evans, A ;
Amouyel, P ;
Arveiler, D ;
Ducimetière, P ;
Bard, JM ;
Ferrières, J .
ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2005, 179 (02) :369-373
[2]   Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome [J].
Chang, J ;
Azziz, R ;
Legro, R ;
Dewailly, D ;
Franks, S ;
Tarlatzis, BC ;
Fauser, B ;
Balen, A ;
Bouchard, P ;
Dahlgren, E ;
Devoto, L ;
Diamanti, E ;
Dunaif, A ;
Filicori, M ;
Homburg, R ;
Ibanez, L ;
Laven, J ;
Magoffin, D ;
Nestler, J ;
Norman, RJ ;
Pasquali, R ;
Pugeat, M ;
Strauss, J ;
Tan, S ;
Taylor, A ;
Wild, R ;
Wild, S ;
Ehrmann, D ;
Lobo, R .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (01) :19-25
[3]   The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women [J].
Cook, Nancy R. ;
Buring, Julie E. ;
Ridker, Paul M. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (01) :21-29
[4]   Cross-sectional association between markers of inflammation and serum sex steroid levels in the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions trial [J].
Crandall, C ;
Palla, S ;
Reboussin, B ;
Hu, P ;
Barrett-Connor, E ;
Reuben, D ;
Greendale, G .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 15 (01) :14-23
[5]   Circulating androgen levels and self-reported sexual function in women [J].
Davis, SR ;
Davison, SL ;
Donath, S ;
Bell, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (01) :91-96
[6]   Measurement of total testosterone in women: comparison of a direct radioimmunoassay versus radioimmunoassay after organic solvent extraction and celite column partition chromatography [J].
Davison, SL ;
Bell, R ;
Montalto, JG ;
Sikaris, K ;
Donath, S ;
Stanczyk, FZ ;
Davis, SR .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (06) :1698-1704
[7]   Androgen levels in adult females: Changes with age, menopause, and oophorectomy [J].
Davison, SL ;
Bell, R ;
Donath, S ;
Montalto, JG ;
Davis, SR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2005, 90 (07) :3847-3853
[8]   Sex differences of endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes - A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ding, EL ;
Song, YQ ;
Malik, VS ;
Liu, SM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (11) :1288-1299
[9]   EVIDENCE FOR DISTINCTIVE AND INTRINSIC DEFECTS IN INSULIN ACTION IN POLYCYSTIC-OVARY-SYNDROME [J].
DUNAIF, A ;
SEGAL, KR ;
SHELLEY, DR ;
GREEN, G ;
DOBRJANSKY, A ;
LICHOLAI, T .
DIABETES, 1992, 41 (10) :1257-1266
[10]   Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure - Classification and regression tree analysis [J].
Fonarow, GC ;
Adams, KF ;
Abraham, WT ;
Yancy, CW ;
Boscardin, WJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (05) :572-580