High- and low-alcohol preferring (HAP and LAP) selected lines of mice diverge greatly in free-choice alcohol consumption. This study investigated whether the lines differ in a measure of alcohol reward not dependent on drinking, specifically place conditioning. Mice were subjected to a differential conditioning procedure in which four alcohol-paired CS; trials on one floor cue (0, 1.5, 3, or 4 g/kg; ns = 20-24) alternated with four saline-paired CS - trials on a different floor cue. Testing was on a split floor, half CS+ and half CS -. HAP and LAP mice showed no preference at 0 g/kg, and equivalent, moderate preference at 1.5 and 3 g/kg alcohol. At 4 g/kg, LAP. but not HAP mice showed an increase in preference. The present findings imply greater efficacy of alcohol preference conditioning in LAP mice, but do not speak for line differences in sensitivity. Results do not support the hypothesis that selection for high drinking yields greater efficacy of alcohol as a reinforcer when reward is measured using a technique that does not rely on drinking. Low drinking in LAP mice may emerge from innate taste avoidance of alcohol as a result of selective breeding for low preference, which prevents them from encountering alcohol's rewarding, pharmacological effects. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.