Evaluation of the FICA Tool for Spiritual Assessment

被引:195
作者
Borneman, Tami [1 ]
Ferrell, Betty [1 ]
Puchalski, Christina M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Dept Populat Sci, Div Nursing Res & Educ, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] George Washington Univ, George Washington Inst Spiritual & Hlth, Washington, DC USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Spiritual care; FICA assessment tool; clinical evaluation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADVANCED CANCER; OLDER-ADULTS; CARE; PHYSICIANS; ISSUES; END; ILL; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.019
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. The National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care includes spiritual care as one of the eight clinical practice domains. There are very few standardized spirituality history tools. Objectives. The purpose of this pilot study was to test the feasibility for the Faith, Importance and Influence, Community, and Address (FICA) Spiritual History Tool in clinical settings. Correlates between the FICA qualitative data and quality of life (QOL) quantitative data also were examined to provide additional insight into spiritual concerns. Methods. The framework of the FICA tool includes Faith or belief, Importance of spirituality, individual's spiritual Community, and interventions to Address spiritual needs. Patients with solid tumors were recruited from ambulatory clinics of a comprehensive cancer center. Items assessing aspects of spirituality within the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy QOL tools were used, and all patients were assessed using the FICA. The sample (n = 76) had a mean age of 57, and almost half were of diverse religions. Results. Most patients rated faith or belief as very important in their lives (mean 8.4; 0-10 scale). FICA quantitative ratings and qualitative comments were closely correlated with items from the QOL tools assessing aspects of spirituality. Conclusion. Findings suggest that the FICA tool is a feasible tool for clinical assessment of spirituality. Addressing spiritual needs and concerns in clinical settings is critical in enhancing QOL. Additional use and evaluation by clinicians of the FICA Spiritual Assessment Tool in usual practice settings are needed. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;40:163-173. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 173
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Anandarajah G, 2001, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V63, P81
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HDB RELIG HLTH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, A national framework and preferred practices for palliative and hospice care quality: A consensus report
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, HDB BASIC CLIN RES
[5]  
Astrow AB, 2001, AM J MED, V110, P283
[6]   Religiousness and spiritual support among advanced cancer patients and associations with end-of-life treatment preferences and quality of life [J].
Balboni, Tracy A. ;
Vanderwerker, Lauren C. ;
Block, Susan D. ;
Paulk, M. Elizabeth ;
Lathan, Christopher S. ;
Peteet, John R. ;
Prigerson, Holly G. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (05) :555-560
[7]  
Brady MJ, 1999, PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, V8, P417, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5<417::AID-PON398>3.3.CO
[8]  
2-W
[9]  
Breitbart William, 2003, J Palliat Med, V6, P979, DOI 10.1089/109662103322654901
[10]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579