Safety and health policy considerations related to the use of buprenorphine/naloxone as an office-based treatment for opiate dependence

被引:38
作者
Bridge, TP
Fudala, PJ
Herbert, S
Leiderman, DB
机构
[1] Natl Inst Drug Abuse, Div Treatment Res & Dev, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, VA Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
buprenorphine; naloxone; office-based treatment; opiate dependence; pharmacotherapy; safety;
D O I
10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00061-9
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
dOpiate dependence remains a fundamental challenge confronting health delivery systems and is often characterized as a social and moral issue. The impact of this disorder on healthcare policy is changing with the increased incidence. of HIV, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis infections in opiate-dependent patients. These medical illnesses have substantial effect on escalating healthcare costs, and, therefore, also affect healthcare policy priorities, which are responsive to these costs. Pharmacological treatments for opiate dependence have had limited success; often the consequence of limited access to care. Hence, there is a need to develop new pharmacotherapies for opiate dependence that extend the range of clinical options, including new first-line treatment approaches. This paper will focus on the safety and health policy considerations related to the use of buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone based on data derived from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance that provide evidence for the use of the medications as first-line treatments in an office-based environment. The evaluation of this evidence formed the basis by the National Institute on Drug Abuse to support and pursue the evaluation and registration of buprenorphine/naloxone and burprenorphine in a public/private sector cooperative effort to become an office-based, first-line treatment for opiate dependence. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:S79 / S85
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, JAMA, V280, P1936
[2]   Deaths attributable to methadone vs buprenorphine in France [J].
Auriacombe, M ;
Franques, P ;
Tignol, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (01) :45-45
[3]  
BALL JC, 1990, EFFECTIVENESS METHAD
[4]   The effect of methadone prescribing in a clinic setting on the criminal activity of drug users [J].
Bates, M ;
Pemberton, DA .
SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 41 (06) :173-175
[5]   THE FUNCTIONING OF INDIVIDUALS ON A DRUG-ABUSE TREATMENT WAITING LIST [J].
BROWN, BS ;
HICKEY, JE ;
CHUNG, AS ;
CRAIG, RD ;
JAFFE, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE, 1989, 15 (03) :261-274
[6]  
*CDCP, 1998, 10 CDCP, P23
[7]   Pharmacokinetics of the combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone [J].
Chiang, CN ;
Hawks, RL .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 70 :S39-S47
[8]   INCLUDING NARCOTIC ADDICTION TREATMENT IN AN OFFICE-BASED PRACTICE [J].
COOPER, JR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (20) :1619-1620
[9]  
De la Fuente L, 1997, ADDICTION, V92, P1749, DOI 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb02895.x
[10]   Office-based treatment of opioid-dependent patients [J].
Fiellin, DA ;
O'Connor, PG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (11) :817-823