Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report

被引:168
作者
Saint, S
Higgins, LA
Nallamothu, BK
Chenoweth, C
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Hlth Syst, Div Gen Med, Patient Safety Enhancement Program, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Ann Arbor Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Internal Med, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-6553(02)48250-8
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Patients who are hospitalized and infected with multidrug-resistant bacteria are usually placed in contact isolation, which requires hospital personnel to gown and glove before patient examination. Contact isolation with active culture surveillance appears beneficial in preventing the spread of drug-resistant infections; however, contact isolation may impede the ability to examine patients as a result of the additional effort required to gown and glove. We assessed whether patients who are hospitalized and placed under contact precautions are examined less often by second- and third-year medical residents (ie, senior medical residents), and attending physicians during morning rounds. Method: We conducted a prospective cohort study on the inpatient medical services at 2 university-affiliated medical centers. We directly observed senior medical residents and attending physicians during morning rounds, and recorded the contact precaution status of the patient and whether they were examined by either physician. Results: Of a total of 139 patients, 31 (22%) were in contact isolation. Senior medical residents examined 26 of 31 patients (84%) in contact isolation versus 94 of 108 patients (87%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.14; P=.58). In comparison, attending physicians examined 11 of 31 patients (35%) in contact isolation versus 79 of 108 patients (73%) not in contact isolation (relative risk, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.79; P < .001). Discussion: Attending physicians are about half as likely to examine patients in contact isolation compared with patients not in contact isolation.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 356
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
BOYCE JM, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P634
[2]   A hospital epidemic of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus:: Risk factors and control [J].
Byers, KE ;
Anglim, AM ;
Anneski, CJ ;
Germanson, TP ;
Gold, HS ;
Durbin, LJ ;
Simonton, BM ;
Farr, BM .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (03) :140-147
[3]   Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals [J].
Garner, JS .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 17 (01) :54-80
[4]  
HIERHOLZER WJ, 1995, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V23, P87
[5]   Adverse effects of contact isolation [J].
Kirkland, KB ;
Weinstein, JM .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9185) :1177-1178
[6]   Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: It is important, it is possible, and it is cost-effective [J].
Mayhall, CG .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (08) :420-423
[7]   Infection-control measures reduce transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an endemic setting [J].
Montecalvo, MA ;
Jarvis, WR ;
Uman, J ;
Shay, DK ;
Petrullo, C ;
Rodney, K ;
Gedris, C ;
Horowitz, HW ;
Wormser, GP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (04) :269-272
[8]   Cost-effectiveness of perirectal surveillance cultures for controlling vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus [J].
Muto, CA ;
Giannetta, ET ;
Durbin, LJ ;
Simonton, BM ;
Farr, BM .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (08) :429-435
[9]   Control of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus in health care facilities in a region. [J].
Ostrowsky, BE ;
Trick, WE ;
Sohn, AH ;
Quirk, SB ;
Holt, S ;
Carson, LA ;
Hill, BC ;
Arduino, MJ ;
Kuehnert, MJ ;
Jarvis, WR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (19) :1427-1433
[10]  
Peel RK, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P58