Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide

被引:1197
作者
Duke, Stephen O. [1 ]
Powles, Stephen B. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Nat Prod Utilizat Res Unit, Natl Ctr Nat Prod Res, University, MS 38677 USA
[2] Univ Western Australia, WA Herbicide Resistance Initiat, Sch Plant Biol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
glyphosate; GMO; herbicide; herbicide-resistant crop;
D O I
10.1002/ps.1518
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Since its commercial introduction in 1974, glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] has become the dominant herbicide worldwide. There are several reasons for its success. Glyphosate is a highly effective broad-spectrum herbicide, yet it is very toxicologically and environmentally safe. Glyphosate translocates well, and its action is slow enough to take advantage of this. Glyphosate is the only herbicide that targets 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), so there are no competing herbicide analogs or classes. Since glyphosate became a generic compound, its cost has dropped dramatically. Perhaps the most important aspect of the success of glyphosate has been the introduction of transgenic, glyphosate-resistant crops in 1996. Almost 90% of all transgenic crops grown worldwide are glyphosate resistant, and the adoption of these crops is increasing at a steady pace. Glyphosate/glyphosate-resistant crop weed management offers significant environmental and other benefits over the technologies that it replaces. The use of this virtually ideal herbicide is now being threatened by the evolution of glyphosate-resistant weeds. Adoption of resistance management practices will be required to maintain the benefits of glyphosate technologies for future generations. (c) 2008 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 325
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] *AM SOYB ASS, 2006, CONS TILL STUD
  • [2] Dicamba resistance: Enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies
    Behrens, Mark R.
    Mutlu, Nedim
    Chakraborty, Sarbani
    Dumitru, Razvan
    Jiang, Wen Zhi
    LaVallee, Bradley J.
    Herman, Patricia L.
    Clemente, Thomas E.
    Weeks, Donald P.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2007, 316 (5828) : 1185 - 1188
  • [3] Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment
    Bennett, R
    Phipps, R
    Strange, A
    Grey, P
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2004, 2 (04) : 273 - 278
  • [4] Characterization and plant expression of a glyphosate-tolerant enolpyruvylshikimate phosphate synthase
    Berg, Brian J. Vande
    Hammer, Philip E.
    Chun, Betty L.
    Schouten, Laura C.
    Carr, Brian
    Guo, Rong
    Peters, Cheryl
    Hinson, Todd K.
    Beilinson, Vadim
    Shekita, Amy
    Deter, Rebekah
    Chen, Zhixian
    Samoylov, Vladimir
    Bryant, Charles T., Jr.
    Stauffer, Maria E.
    Eberle, Timothy
    Moellenbeck, Dan J.
    Carozzi, Nadine B.
    Koziel, Mike G.
    Duck, Nicholas B.
    [J]. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 64 (04) : 340 - 345
  • [5] Perspectives on glyphosate resistance
    Bradshaw, LD
    Padgette, SR
    Kimball, SL
    Wells, BH
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (01) : 189 - 198
  • [6] Brookes G., 2006, AgBioForum, V9, P139
  • [7] SUSCEPTIBILITY OF BERMUDAGRASS (CYNODON-DACTYLON) BIOTYPES TO SEVERAL HERBICIDES
    BRYSON, CT
    WILLS, GD
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 1985, 33 (06) : 848 - 852
  • [8] Caseley J. C., 1985, The herbicide glyphosate, P92
  • [9] Cerdeira, 2005, COLLECTION BIOSAFETY, V2, P66
  • [10] The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: A review
    Cerdeira, Antonio L.
    Duke, Stephen O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (05) : 1633 - 1658