Technology as Moral Proxy Autonomy and Paternalism by Design

被引:21
作者
Millar, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Philosophy, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Engineering;
D O I
10.1109/MTS.2015.2425612
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
It is often said that technological artifacts are morally neutral, that they are bereft of morality save for whatever we might say about their designers and users. Designers and users, being people, tend to be considered the proper and exclusive focus of our moral attention in the designer-technology-user trio, while technological artifacts, mere tools, cannot contribute anything morally. Technological neutrality, a common term for describing this perspective, gives rise to trite statements like, guns don't kill people, people kill people. According to technological neutrality, whatever morality is pinned on the artifact is done so in error. Instead, one must refer to the people surrounding an artifact to get an accurate read on the moral claims that can be associated with its use. Thus, technological neutrality supports a strict kind of delineation between people and things: people can be the subjects of a moral analysis; things cannot. © 2015 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 55
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WIRED
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, REUTERS
[3]  
Calo R., CALIFORNIA IN PRESS, V103
[4]  
CANTOR NL, 2005, MAKING MED DECISIONS
[5]  
College of Nurses of Ontario, 2009, PRACT GUID CONS
[6]  
Draper H., 2007, The Bioethics Reader, Editors' Choice, P73
[7]  
Guizzo E, 2011, GOOGLES SELF DRIVING
[8]  
Hayden E., 2012, TIME NEWSFEED SEP
[9]  
Jonsen AlbertR., 2008, SHORT HIST MED ETHIC
[10]  
Kerr Ian., 2010, RADICAL EXTREMISM BA