Comparative performance of several flexible docking programs and scoring functions: Enrichment studies for a diverse set of pharmaceutically relevant targets

被引:133
作者
Zhou, Zhiyong
Felts, Anthony K.
Friesner, Richard A.
Levy, Ronald M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, BioMaPS Inst Quantitative Biol, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Chem, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci7000346
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Virtual screening by molecular docking has become a widely used approach to lead discovery in the pharmaceutical industry when a high-resolution structure of the biological target of interest is available. The performance of three widely used docking programs (Glide, GOLD, and DOCK) for virtual database screening is studied when they are applied to the same protein target and ligand set. Comparisons of the docking programs and scoring functions using a large and diverse data set of pharmaceutically interesting targets and active compounds are carried out. We focus on the problem of docking and scoring flexible compounds which are sterically capable of docking into a rigid conformation of the receptor. The Glide XP methodology is shown to consistently yield enrichments superior to the two alternative methods, while GOLD outperforms DOCK on average. The study also shows that docking into multiple receptor structures can decrease the docking error in screening a diverse set of active compounds.
引用
收藏
页码:1599 / 1608
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[2]   Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools [J].
Cummings, MD ;
DesJarlais, RL ;
Gibbs, AC ;
Mohan, V ;
Jaeger, EP .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 48 (04) :962-976
[3]   Empirical scoring functions .1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes [J].
Eldridge, MD ;
Murray, CW ;
Auton, TR ;
Paolini, GV ;
Mee, RP .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 1997, 11 (05) :425-445
[4]  
Ewing TJA, 1997, J COMPUT CHEM, V18, P1175, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19970715)18:9<1175::AID-JCC6>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-O
[6]   DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases [J].
Ewing, TJA ;
Makino, S ;
Skillman, AG ;
Kuntz, ID .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) :411-428
[7]   Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy [J].
Friesner, RA ;
Banks, JL ;
Murphy, RB ;
Halgren, TA ;
Klicic, JJ ;
Mainz, DT ;
Repasky, MP ;
Knoll, EH ;
Shelley, M ;
Perry, JK ;
Shaw, DE ;
Francis, P ;
Shenkin, PS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) :1739-1749
[8]   Extra precision glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes [J].
Friesner, Richard A. ;
Murphy, Robert B. ;
Repasky, Matthew P. ;
Frye, Leah L. ;
Greenwood, Jeremy R. ;
Halgren, Thomas A. ;
Sanschagrin, Paul C. ;
Mainz, Daniel T. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 49 (21) :6177-6196
[9]   Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions [J].
Gohlke, H ;
Hendlich, M ;
Klebe, G .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2000, 295 (02) :337-356
[10]   Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening [J].
Halgren, TA ;
Murphy, RB ;
Friesner, RA ;
Beard, HS ;
Frye, LL ;
Pollard, WT ;
Banks, JL .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) :1750-1759