Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001

被引:46
作者
Burke, FJT
McHugh, S
Hall, AC
Randall, RC
Widstrom, E
Forss, H
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Dent, Birmingham B4 6NN, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Dept Stat, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
[3] 3M Co, Global Clin Affairs, ESPE, St Paul, MN 55144 USA
[4] Natl Res & Dev Ctr Welf & Hlth, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4810258
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective This study determined the reasons for dentists' choice of materials, in particular amalgam and resin composite, in Great Britain. Method A questionnaire was developed to elicit this information. The names and addresses of 1,000 UK-base dentists were selected at random. The questionnaire was mailed to these dentists with an explanatory letter and reply-paid envelope. Results Six hundred and fifty four replies were received. Regarding choice of material, 100% of respondents cited clinical indication as the most influential factor, although patients' aesthetic demands (99%), patients' choice (95%) and patients' financial situation (92%) were also reported to influence respondents' choice. Thirty-five per cent of respondents used composite 'sometimes', 15% 'often', and 1% 'always' in extensive load-bearing cavities in molar teeth. For composite restorations in posterior teeth, 92% 'always', 'often' or 'sometimes' used the total etch technique and 53% never used rubber dam. Seventy per cent of respondents agreed with the statement 'discontinuation of amalgam restricts a dentist's ability to adequately treat patients'. Eighty-one per cent considered that the growth in the use of composites increased the total cost of oral healthcare. Conclusions Forty nine per cent of the respondents from England and Wales seldom or never place large composite restorations in molar teeth. Their choice of material is influenced greatly by clinical indications, and patients' aesthetic demands.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 618
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, 1998, J Am Dent Assoc, V129, P1627, DOI [10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0114, DOI 10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.1998.0114]
[2]  
*AUD COMM, DENT PRIM DENT CAR S
[3]  
Brown LJ, 2000, J DENT RES, V79, P461
[4]  
Burke F J, 2001, Dent Update, V28, P388
[5]  
Clinical Research Associates, 1995, CRA NEWSLETTER, V19, P1
[6]  
CRAIG BD, 2001, J DENT RES, P271
[7]   CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF 3 POSTERIOR COMPOSITE AND 2 AMALGAM RESTORATIVE MATERIALS - 3-YEAR RESULTS [J].
CUNNINGHAM, J ;
MAIR, LH ;
FOSTER, MA ;
IRELAND, RS .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1990, 169 (10) :319-323
[8]  
DILLMAN DA, 1977, MAIL TELEPHONE SURVE
[9]   How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review [J].
Downer, MC ;
Azli, NA ;
Bedi, R ;
Moles, DR ;
Setchell, DJ .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1999, 187 (08) :432-439
[10]  
EICK D, 2001, J DENT RES, V80, P271