Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain - A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group

被引:135
作者
van Tulder, MW
Ostelo, R
Vlaeyen, JWS
Linton, SJ
Morley, SJ
Assendelft, WJJ
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Orebro Med Ctr Hosp, Dept Occupat Med, S-70185 Orebro, Sweden
[4] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Psychiat & Behav Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dutch Cochrane Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
behavioral treatment; Cochrane collaboration; effectiveness; systematic review;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200102010-00012
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Summary of Background Data. The treatment of chronic low back pain is not primarily focused on removing an underlying organic disease but at the reduction of disability through the modification of environmental contingencies and cognitive processes. Behavioral interventions are commonly used in the treatment of chronic (disabling) low back pain. Objectives. To determine whether behavioral therapy is more effective than reference treatments for chronic nonspecific low back pain and which type of behavioral treatment is most effective. Methods. The authors searched the Medline and PsychLit databases and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to April 1999, and Embase up to September 1999. Also screened were references of identified randomized trials and relevant systematic reviews. Methodologic quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The magnitude of effect was assessed by computing a pooled effect size for each domain (i.e., behavioral outcomes, overall improvement, back pain-specific and generic functional status, return to work, and pain intensity) using the random effects model. Results. Only six (25%) studies were high quality. There is strong evidence (level 1) that behavioral treatment has a moderate positive effect on pain intensity (pooled effect size 0.62; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.25, 0.98), and small positive effects on generic functional status (pooled effect size 0.35; 95% CI: -0.04, 0.74) and behavioral outcomes (pooled effect size 0.40; 95% Cl: 0.10, 0.70) of patients with chronic low back pain when compared with waiting-list controls or no treatment. There is moderate evidence (level 2) that a addition of behavioral component to a usual treatment program for chronic low backpain has no positive short-term effect on generic functional status (pooled effect size 0.31; 95% Cl: -0.01, 0.64), pain intensity (pooled effect size 0.03; 95% Cl: -0.30, 0.36), and behavioral outcomes (pooled effect size 0.19; 95% Cl: -0.08, 0.45). Conclusions. Behavioral treatment seems to be an effective treatment for patients with chronic low back pain,but it is still unknown what type of patients benefit most from what type of behavioral treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 281
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS FOR THE REHABILITATION OF LOW-BACK-PAIN - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATION
    ALTMAIER, EM
    LEHMANN, TR
    RUSSELL, DW
    WEINSTEIN, JN
    KAO, CF
    [J]. PAIN, 1992, 49 (03) : 329 - 335
  • [2] ANDRASIK F, 1986, PAIN MANAGEMENT HDB, P213
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1987, Spine
  • [4] [Anonymous], BEHAV METHODS CHRONI
  • [5] BIOFEEDBACK IN BACK MUSCLE STRENGTHENING
    ASFOUR, SS
    KHALIL, TM
    WALY, SM
    GOLDBERG, ML
    ROSOMOFF, RS
    ROSOMOFF, HL
    [J]. SPINE, 1990, 15 (06) : 510 - 513
  • [6] Incorporation of cognitive-behavioral treatment into the medical care of chronic low back patients: A controlled randomized study in German pain treatment centers
    Basler, HD
    Jakle, C
    KronerHerwig, B
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1997, 31 (02) : 113 - 124
  • [7] Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials - The CONSORT statement
    Begg, C
    Cho, M
    Eastwood, S
    Horton, R
    Moher, D
    Olkin, I
    Pitkin, R
    Rennie, D
    Schulz, KF
    Simel, D
    Stroup, DF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (08): : 637 - 639
  • [8] BELAR CD, 1986, PAIN MANAGEMENT HDB, P131
  • [9] EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS ON NECK, SHOULDER AND LOW-BACK-PAIN IN FEMALE HOSPITAL STAFF
    BRU, E
    MYKLETUN, RJ
    BERGE, WT
    SVEBAK, S
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 1994, 9 (05) : 371 - 382
  • [10] A CONTROLLED EVALUATION OF PARA-SPINAL EMG BIOFEEDBACK IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK PAIN
    BUSH, C
    DITTO, B
    FEUERSTEIN, M
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 4 (04) : 307 - 321