Relief of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with pregabalin: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

被引:340
作者
Richter, RW
Portenoy, R
Sharma, U
Lamoreaux, L
Bockbrader, H
Knapp, LE
机构
[1] Beth Israel Med Ctr, Dept Pain Med & Palliat Care, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] St Johns Hosp, Dept Neurol, Tulsa, OK USA
[3] Pfizer Global Res & Dev, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
pregabalin; neuropathic pain; diabetic neuropathy;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2004.12.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
: This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of pregabalin in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. Two hundred forty-six men and women with painful diabetic neuropathy received pregabalin (150 or 600 mg/day by mouth) or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was mean pain score at the end of treatment. Efficacy results indicate that pregabalin 600 mg/day significantly decreased mean pain score to 4.3 (vs 5.6 for placebo, P =.0002) and increased the proportion of patients who had a >= 50% decrease from baseline pain (39% vs 15% for placebo, P =.002). Pregabalin also significantly reduced sleep interference, past week and present pain intensity, sensory and affective pain scores, and bodily pain and decreased by >= 50% the number of patients describing their pain as gnawing, sickening, fearful, and punishing- cruel. More patients receiving pregabalin 600 mg/day than placebo showed improvement, as rated on the Clinical and Patient Global Impression of Change scales, 73% vs 45% and 85% vs 47%, respectively. Pregabalin 150 mg/day was essentially no different from placebo. Dizziness was the most common side effect. These study results show pregabalin 600 mg/day to be safe and effective in reducing the pain and other associated symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy. Perspective: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is a challenging neuropathic pain syndrome. This randomized controlled trial demonstrates that pregabalin, a new drug that interacts with the alpha(2)-delta protein subunit of the voltage-gated calcium channel, is an efficacious and safe treatment for the pain of this condition. (c) 2005 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 260
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Backonja, M ;
Beydoun, A ;
Edwards, KR ;
Schwartz, SL ;
Fonseca, V ;
Hes, M ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Garofalo, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (21) :1831-1836
[2]   Gabapentin dosing for neuropathic pain: Evidence from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials [J].
Backonja, M ;
Glanzman, RL .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 25 (01) :81-104
[3]  
CHAN A W, 1990, Pain Clinic, V3, P147
[4]   Antidepressants and anticonvulsants for diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia: A quantitative systematic review [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ ;
Wiffen, P .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (06) :449-458
[5]  
Dooley DJ, 2000, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V295, P1086
[6]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[7]   Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294
[8]   Gabapentin and pregabalin, but not morphine and amitriptyline, block both static and dynamic components of mechanical allodynia induced by streptozocin in the rat [J].
Field, MJ ;
McCleary, S ;
Hughes, J ;
Singh, L .
PAIN, 1999, 80 (1-2) :391-398
[9]   Inhibition of neuronal Ca2+ influx by gabapentin and pregabalin in the human neocortex [J].
Fink, K ;
Dooley, DJ ;
Meder, WP ;
Suman-Chauhan, N ;
Duffy, S ;
Clusmann, H ;
Göthert, M .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 42 (02) :229-236
[10]   Painful diabetic polyneuropathy: epidemiology, pain description, and quality of life [J].
Galer, BS ;
Gianas, A ;
Jensen, MP .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2000, 47 (02) :123-128